The Fencing Center - san jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Andrew | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 2 | GUO Joey | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 3 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | XU Ethan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 5 | SHENOY Sean | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | TEWARI Amaira | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% | |
| 8 | HO Cameron | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | LEE Abigail | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
| 10 | SRIDHARA Shaan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 11 | LI Aaron | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 12 | KO Cameron | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 13 | YU Xintong | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | KIM Natalie | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 15 | CHEUNG Henry | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | WONG Connor | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 17 | KO Ian | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | KO Adeline | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 19 | ANDERSON Gage | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 20 | HONDA Emi | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | ANSARI Sara | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 22 | NGUYEN Nolan | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | LIU Madeleine | - | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 24 | STERNAD Pia | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | FENG Scarlett | 4% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | HSU Liam | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.