The Fencing Center - san jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
2 | GUO Joey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
3 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
3 | XU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
5 | SHENOY Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
5 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
7 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% | |
8 | HO Cameron | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
9 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | |
10 | SRIDHARA Shaan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
11 | LI Aaron | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - | |
12 | KO Cameron | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | YU Xintong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
14 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
15 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
16 | WONG Connor | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
17 | KO Ian | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
18 | KO Adeline | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
19 | ANDERSON Gage | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
20 | HONDA Emi | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
21 | ANSARI Sara | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
22 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
23 | LIU Madeleine | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - |
24 | STERNAD Pia | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
25 | FENG Scarlett | 100% | 96% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | |
26 | HSU Liam | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.