Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 2 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 68% |
| 3 | DUBROVICH Jacqueline | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 3 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | - | - | - | - | - | 12% | 87% |
| 5 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% |
| 6 | JING Emily | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 7 | MASSIALAS Sabrina C. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 8 | LEE Alina | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
| 9 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 8% | |
| 10 | CHO Sabrina N. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
| 11 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 51% | 26% | 1% |
| 12 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 14 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 15 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 16 | DEVORE Delphine P. | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
| 17 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 39% | 6% |
| 18 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 19 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
| 20 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
| 21 | GOOR Viviene E. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 23 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 1% | 9% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CAO Ying | - | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 31% | 4% |
| 25 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 8% |
| 26 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 27 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 27 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 29 | KIM Rachael | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 30 | LUO Ziyue | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 31 | CHO Rebecca H. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 32 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | TAFFEL sara | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
| 34 | RHODES Zander | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 35 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 36 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 37 | ANDREYENKA Yana | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% |
| 38 | LEE Lavender | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 1% |
| 39 | SEO IRENE Y. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 28% | 3% |
| 41 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% |
| 42 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | ORVANANOS Anice | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
| 46 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 47 | JO Mia C. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | CHEN Renee | 6% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | FENG Grace | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SHEN Emilia | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | KIM Katherine | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | |
| 53 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 45% | 5% |
| 54 | PETROVA Kristina | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 2% |
| 55 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 56 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 49% | 4% |
| 57 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 18% | 1% |
| 58 | CHEN Chloe I. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | SAIFEE Lamya | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | YANG Emma | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | WANDJI Anais | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | FUNG Vera | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | YANG Audrey | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | CHOW Annabelle | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 67 | LEE Yejine | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 10% |
| 68 | ANDREYENKA Hanna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 69 | VIANNA Gabriella | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 70 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 22% | 47% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | LAI Sophia | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 72 | SHMUKLER Maria | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
| 73 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% |
| 74 | BREKER Anika | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% |
| 75 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | KO Claire | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | SHA Yi Ling | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | LIN Zhi Tong | 1% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | ADLER Polly Z. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 80 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 81 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 82 | CASCONE Emily | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | FUNG Emma | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 85 | YANG Iris | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 86 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | KOKES Aurora | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 88 | LEE Annora Y. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 89 | KORABLINA Aleksandra | - | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 36% | 6% |
| 90 | PARK Rowan M. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 90 | DENG Melissa | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | SWANSON Alexa | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 93 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 94 | PEVZNER Nicole | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 96 | RENTON Samantha | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 96 | HAO Danica | 14% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | WANG CAROL | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 100 | MUSTO Isabella | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 101 | KIM Rachel | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | KLINE Melissa C. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 103 | LI Eleanor | 25% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | SHMAY Anastasia | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 105 | ERTUN Lal | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | YAO Ada | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 107 | KETTELLE Molly | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 108 | MI Aileen | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 109 | CHANG Elizabeth | 11% | 39% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | LI Sophia M. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | WANG Jasmine | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | WANG SIQI | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 113 | MEI Sarah | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 114 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | HSU Kaylin | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | WU Julianna Y. | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 117 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 118 | CEPERO Rosabel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 119 | LEVY Avery | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 120 | CASTANEDA Keira | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 121 | CALISE Ella | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 122 | HU Felice | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 123 | VO Bao-Vy | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 123 | YU Jane | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | COOPER Piper W. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 126 | LUONG Tiffany C. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 126 | ROY Layla | 11% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 126 | LEE Fiona E. | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 129 | DONG Angela | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 130 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.