Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 2 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 3 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 3 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 5 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 6 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% | |
| 7 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 8 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 9 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% |
| 10 | PALMER Meredith K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 11 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 12 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 14 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 15 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | FUNG Vera | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 17 | CASCONE Emily | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 18 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 19 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 19 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 22 | LI Eleanor | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | LIN Zhi Tong | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 8% |
| 24 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 25 | CALISE Ella | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 26 | KIM Rachel | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 27 | YANG Iris | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 28 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 29 | YAO Ada | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 30 | PEVZNER Nicole | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 32 | REN Kayley | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | HAYES Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 34 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 6% |
| 35 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 36 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 37 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 39 | ERTUN Lal | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 40 | ZELDIN Nadia | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LI Sophia M. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 42 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 43 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 44 | DENG Melissa | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | HSU Kaylin | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 46 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 47 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | SUN Emily | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 49 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 50 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 51 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 53 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | TAYLOR Gabby | 37% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 56 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% |
| 57 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 58 | FUNG Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 59 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 60 | FENG Grace | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
| 61 | KETTELLE Molly | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 62 | ROY Layla | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | MEI Sarah | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 64 | OWENS Elise | 2% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | WANG CAROL | - | 6% | 39% | 42% | 12% | - | |
| 66 | LEE Fiona E. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 67 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
| 68 | WANG SIQI | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 69 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 70 | FENG Audrey | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 71 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 72 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 73 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 74 | MU Allison | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 75 | YANG Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 76 | HO Addison | - | 9% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 77 | ZHANG Selena | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 78 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | PAULUS Isabella | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | HAO Danica | - | 5% | 35% | 45% | 14% | - | |
| 82 | LENK Sophie | 2% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 84 | WANG Yudi | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 86 | OH Ceana | - | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 87 | WANG Jasmine | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 87 | DONG Angela | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | WANG Sabrina | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 90 | KO Claire | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 91 | HU Felice | - | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 92 | MUSTO Isabella | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 94 | YAN Noelle | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 95 | CUI alivia | 3% | 33% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 96 | BASILE Gianna | 16% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | WANG Chloe | 4% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 97 | VO Bao-Vy | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 99 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | WANG Sophia | 7% | 52% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | DONG Emily | 29% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 102 | HOBSON Ava | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 103 | LAI Sophia | - | < 1% | 8% | 36% | 48% | 7% | |
| 104 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 105 | BERGEL Daphne | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | ZHANG Ivy | 2% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 107 | KATS Ekaterina | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 108 | CHENG Isa | 34% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 109 | SWANSON Alexa | 1% | 9% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 110 | GUO Audrey | 31% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 111 | CHANG Janelle | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 111 | CHEN Sophie | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 113 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 1% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 114 | YU Jane | 7% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | NEUMAN Sophie | 5% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 117 | LIU Elinda | 11% | 49% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | LEVY Avery | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 119 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 62% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 120 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 121 | SHMUKLER Maria | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 122 | LIU Long | 26% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 123 | CAMPBELL June | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 123 | CAO Kayla | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 125 | LAWRENCE Nia | 44% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 126 | RICHARDS Axelle | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 127 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 128 | COMO Gabriella | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 129 | PHILLIPS Hattie | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 129 | TSE Isabel | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 131 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.