Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HAYES Nadia | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | CALISE Ella | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | CHEN Renee | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
5 | CHEN Chloe I. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
6 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | YANG Iris | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
8 | FENG Grace | D D D V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
9 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
10 | SAIFEE Lamya | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
11 | HSU Kaylin | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | CHO Emily (Euran) | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
13 | SHMAY Anastasia | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | COOPER Piper W. | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
15 | BIODROWICZ Julia | V D V D D V | V V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
16 | YANG Audrey | D D V V D D | V V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
17 | WANG SIQI | V D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
18 | LIN Zhi Tong | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
19 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
20 | CASTANEDA Keira | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | CHANG Elizabeth | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
22 | WANG Yudi | V D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
23 | MANIKTALA Prisha | D V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
24 | YANG Emma | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
25 | LUO Ziyue | V V V D V D | V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
26 | TANG Melody Fujiao | D D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
27 | LAI Sophia | V D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
28 | MU Allison | D V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
29 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
30 | LI Sophia M. | V D D D V D | V V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
31 | VO Bao-Vy | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
32 | DENG Melissa | D D D D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
33 | PEVZNER Nicole | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
34 | CHOW Annabelle | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
35 | HO Addison | V V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
36 | WANG Joanna | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
37 | CASCONE Emily | D V V V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
38 | LI Eleanor | D V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
39 | MCSHERRY Ava | D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
40 | PAULUS Isabella | V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
41 | LENK Sophie | V D V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
42 | YU Jane | V V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
43 | ZHANG Eunice | D V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
44 | BASILE Gianna | D V V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
45 | ZELDIN Nadia | D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
46 | KO Claire | V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | SWANSON Alexa | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
48 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D V V V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
49 | SHA Yi Ling | D D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | WANG Jasmine | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
51 | HU Felice | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | HAO Danica | D D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
53 | WANG Sabrina | D D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
54 | PAULUS Sloane E. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
55 | ZHANG Ivy | V D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
56 | ZHANG Selena | V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
57 | ZHENG Julie | V D D D V D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
58 | YAN Noelle | D D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
59 | WANG CAROL | D D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
60 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | V D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
61 | LIU Long | D D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
62 | CUI alivia | D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
63 | WANG Sophia | D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
64 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
65 | WANG Chloe | D D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
66 | LEVY Avery | D V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
67 | LEVESQUE Brielle | V V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
68 | DONG Angela | D V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
69 | BERGEL Daphne | V V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
70 | LI Han (Helina) | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
71 | ROY Layla | V D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
72 | HOBSON Ava | V D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
73 | CHENG Isa | D D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
74 | HARRIS Julia | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
75 | OWENS Elise | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
76 | KIM Sydney | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
77 | REN Kayley | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
78 | KATS Ekaterina | V V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
79 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
80 | OH Ceana | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
81 | LIU Elinda | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
82 | CHEN Sophie | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | GUO Audrey | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
84 | CAMPBELL June | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
85 | DONG Emily | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
86 | TSE Isabel | D V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
87 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
88 | MARTIRE Alessandra | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
89 | SHMUKLER Maria | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
90 | FENG Audrey | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
90 | CHANG Janelle | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
92 | SNYDERS Evelyn | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
93 | LAWRENCE Nia | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
94 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
95 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.