Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HAYES Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
2 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
3 | CALISE Ella | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
3 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 34% | |
5 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
6 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 38% |
7 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
8 | FENG Grace | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
9 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
10 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
11 | HSU Kaylin | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
12 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
13 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
14 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
15 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
16 | YANG Audrey | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
17 | WANG SIQI | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
18 | LIN Zhi Tong | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
19 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
20 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
20 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
22 | WANG Yudi | 2% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
23 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
24 | YANG Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
25 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
26 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | LAI Sophia | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
28 | MU Allison | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 37% | 8% | |
29 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
30 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
31 | VO Bao-Vy | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
32 | DENG Melissa | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
33 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
34 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
35 | HO Addison | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
36 | WANG Joanna | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
37 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
38 | LI Eleanor | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
39 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
40 | PAULUS Isabella | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | LENK Sophie | - | 7% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
42 | YU Jane | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
44 | BASILE Gianna | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
45 | ZELDIN Nadia | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
46 | KO Claire | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
47 | SWANSON Alexa | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
48 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
49 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
50 | WANG Jasmine | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
51 | HU Felice | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
51 | HAO Danica | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
53 | WANG Sabrina | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
54 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
55 | ZHANG Ivy | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
56 | ZHANG Selena | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
57 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
58 | YAN Noelle | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
59 | WANG CAROL | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
60 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
61 | LIU Long | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
62 | CUI alivia | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
63 | WANG Sophia | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
64 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | WANG Chloe | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
66 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
67 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
68 | DONG Angela | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | BERGEL Daphne | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
70 | LI Han (Helina) | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
71 | ROY Layla | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
72 | HOBSON Ava | - | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
73 | CHENG Isa | 22% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
74 | HARRIS Julia | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
75 | OWENS Elise | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
76 | KIM Sydney | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
77 | REN Kayley | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
78 | KATS Ekaterina | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
80 | OH Ceana | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
81 | LIU Elinda | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
82 | CHEN Sophie | 19% | 54% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
83 | GUO Audrey | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
84 | CAMPBELL June | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
85 | DONG Emily | 10% | 44% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
86 | TSE Isabel | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
87 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
88 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
89 | SHMUKLER Maria | 1% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
90 | FENG Audrey | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
90 | CHANG Janelle | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
92 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
93 | LAWRENCE Nia | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
94 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 10% | 53% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
95 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.