Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
2 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
3 | LI Alexis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
3 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
5 | PABIAN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
6 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
7 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
8 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
9 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
10 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
11 | WANG yining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
12 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
13 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | |
14 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 21% |
15 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
16 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
17 | DONG Angel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
18 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
18 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
20 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
21 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
22 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
23 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
24 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
25 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% |
26 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
27 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
28 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
29 | CARTER Keely | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
30 | CHI Claire | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
31 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
32 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
33 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
34 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
35 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
36 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
37 | HUCHWAJDA Pola | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
38 | BAINS Nandini | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
40 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
41 | MCGRAW Sadie | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
42 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
43 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
44 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
45 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
46 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
47 | PADANILAM Lily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
48 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
49 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
50 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
51 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
52 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
53 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
54 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
55 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
56 | XIE Nora | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
57 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
58 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
59 | LEE Alyson | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
60 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
61 | WU Yuwei | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
62 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
63 | HUANG Neila | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
64 | UEMOTO Lynn | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | SAYSON Andrea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
66 | KALISHMAN Anna | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
67 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
68 | BARROSO Isabela | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
69 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
70 | WALLER London | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
71 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
72 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
72 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
74 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
75 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
75 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
77 | DEHON Inès | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
78 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
79 | NADKARNI Marisa | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
80 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
81 | STONE Coral | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
82 | BERNARD Kathryn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
83 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
84 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 100% | 77% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
85 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
86 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 97% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
87 | SYED Azra | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
88 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
89 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
90 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
91 | KWON Ava | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
92 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
93 | HU Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
93 | ZAWADA Milena | 100% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
95 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% | |
96 | KIM Karen | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
97 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
98 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
99 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
100 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
101 | XU Demi | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
102 | ZHANG Jiaqing | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
103 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
104 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
105 | POLSTON Ella | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
106 | BANGALORE Shriya | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
107 | KIRBY Skye | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.