Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | - | 4% | 45% | 51% |
2 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
3 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | - | 1% | 19% | 57% | 23% |
3 | MILLER Jackson | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
5 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 53% | 36% |
6 | BRENNEMAN Adam | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
7 | REEN Stephen | - | 2% | 29% | 58% | 10% | - |
8 | STOCK Olivia | - | 10% | 53% | 31% | 5% | - |
9 | RIPLEY Ian | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 16% |
10 | VAN DYK Mark | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
11 | HOSTETTER Gerrit | - | 3% | 23% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
12 | PLUMMER Ken | 29% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
13 | MACNEIL Sydney | 23% | 54% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
14 | STAUBITZ Marc | 4% | 27% | 49% | 19% | 1% | - |
15 | HILTON Jacob | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - |
16 | ALTENHOF Ian | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
17 | HENDERSON Emery | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
18 | DUTTON Kimberly | 55% | 41% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.