2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | 2020-2021 | Before 2020 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 8 | 2 | - | - | - | 10 |
Losses | 14 | 18 | - | - | - | 32 |
Win Ratio | 36.4% | 10.0% | - | - | - | 23.8% |
Pool Victories | 6 | 1 | - | - | - | 7 |
Pool Losses | 10 | 13 | - | - | - | 23 |
Pool Win Ratio | 37.5% | 7.1% | - | - | - | 23.3% |
DE Victories | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | 3 |
DE Losses | 4 | 5 | - | - | - | 9 |
DE Win Ratio | 33.3% | 16.7% | - | - | - | 25.0% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | 2020-2021 | Before 2020 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Easy wins† | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
Easy wins as % of wins | 0.0% | 50.0% | - | - | - | 10.0% |
Close wins‡ | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
Close wins as % of all wins | 12.5% | 50.0% | - | - | - | 20.0% |
Close losses‡ | 6 | 2 | - | - | - | 8 |
Close losses as % of all losses | 42.9% | 11.1% | - | - | - | 25.0% |
Big losses† | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | 7 |
Big losses as % of all losses | 21.4% | 22.2% | - | - | - | 21.9% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | 2020-2021 | Before 2020 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 4 | - | - | - | - | 4 |
Victories as % of all victories | 50.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 40.0% |
Losses | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | 6 |
Losses as % of all losses | 21.4% | 16.7% | - | - | - | 18.8% |
Total | 7 | 3 | - | - | - | 10 |
Total as % of all bouts | 31.8% | 15.0% | - | - | - | 23.8% |
2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | 2021-2022 | 2020-2021 | Before 2020 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 4 | 5 | - | - | - | 9 |
Tournaments | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 5 |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 4:1 | WANG Ellie | 1 | U | 5 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 4:5 | WELLS Aenea | 3 | U | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | W | 1:0 | SCHROEDER Abigail | 6 | U | 3 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | ||||||
Pool | W | 4:1 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 2 | U | 6 | |||||||
Pool | L | 3:5 | MACNEIL Sydney | 4 | U | 1 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
T8 | W | 13:8 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 2 | U | 6 | |||||||
T4 | L | 13:14 | MACNEIL Sydney | 4 | U | 1 | Indianapolis Fencing Club |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 4:5 | WANG Ellie | 12 | U | 12 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 1:5 | MACNEIL Matthew | 4 | C23 | 6 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1612 | 1183 | 50.1 | 26% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | STAUBITZ Marc | 5 | D24 | 8 | 1425 | 1133 | 57.5 | 33% | |||
Pool | L | 3:5 | VAN DYK Mark | 13 | U | 5 | Salle des Lutins | 1985 | 1075 | 16.7 | 9% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | GUILFORD Corey | 1 | C24 | 7 | 2065 | 1059 | 12.2 | 6% | |||
Pool | W | 5:3 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | 9 | U | 11 | |||||||
T16 | L | 6:15 | STAUBITZ Marc | 5 | D24 | 8 | 1435 | 837 | 76.4 | 21% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T8 | W | 15:10 | HENDERSON Emery | 4 | U | 7 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
T4 | L | 11:15 | ALTENHOF Ian | 1 | U | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1166 | 981 | 144.2 | 41% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 1:4 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | 3 | B22 | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2617 | 1007 | 3.1 | 1% | ||
Pool | L | 4:5 | STOCK Olivia | 8 | E23 | 8 | Fencing Club At Indiana University / Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 0:5 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 4 | C23 | 3 | Salle des Lutins | 2377 | 1004 | 7.0 | 2% | ||
Pool | W | 5:3 | HOSTETTER Gerrit | 9 | E23 | 11 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. / Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1751 | 997 | 185.7 | 15% | ||
Pool | W | 5:2 | DUTTON Kimberly | 15 | U | 18 | |||||||
T16 | L | 8:12 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | 3 | B22 | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2820 | 986 | 5.0 | 1% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | W | 5:1 | REEN Stephen | 14 | U | 11 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1279 | 944 | 167.7 | 34% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | ADKINS Jerry | 5 | D22 | 8 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2187 | 1111 | 22.0 | 7% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 2 | C23 | 2 | Purdue Fencing Club-purdue Univ. | 2469 | 1089 | 9.2 | 3% | ||
Pool | L | 1:4 | MACNEIL Matthew | 15 | U | 3 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1405 | 1080 | 72.9 | 33% | ||
T16 | L | 9:14 | ADKINS Jerry | 5 | D22 | 8 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1782 | 1073 | 86.9 | 21% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T8 | W | 15:13 | DAWES Isabel | 6 | U | 6 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
T4 | L | 8:15 | REEN Stephen | 2 | U | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2007 | 1153 | 79.9 | 20% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 0:5 | THOMAS Samuel | 2 | B22 | 1 | Fencing Club At Indiana University / Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2584 | 1178 | 17.0 | 3% | ||
Pool | L | 3:5 | STOCK Olivia | 7 | E22 | 9 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | ||||||
Pool | L | 3:5 | ORGAN Jason | 13 | U | 11 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1529 | 1161 | 123.6 | 31% | ||
Pool | L | 3:4 | MILLER Jackson | 6 | D23 | 6 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1678 | 1038 | 68.3 | 19% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | GOSMEYER Matthew E. | 3 | B21 | 3 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2097 | 969 | 25.5 | 7% | ||
T16 | L | 3:15 | RIPLEY Ian | 1 | B23 | 5 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2472 | 1189 | 35.5 | 5% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | L | 3:5 | ORGAN Jason | 11 | U | 7 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1613 | 2500 | 949.2 | 80% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 1 | B21 | 3 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2246 | 1551 | 144.3 | 20% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | BETTRIDGE Jessica | 5 | E19 | 9 | |||||||
Pool | L | 3:5 | RIPLEY Ian | 4 | C22 | 2 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 2112 | 1407 | 113.0 | 19% | ||
Pool | L | 2:5 | MARTIN Maximilian | 8 | U | 5 | 1859 | 1293 | 115.3 | 23% | |||
T16 | L | 12:15 | ORGAN Jason | 11 | U | 7 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1263 | 1626 | 437.1 | 66% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T8 | L | 5:15 | SPURGEON William | 4 | U | 1 | Indianapolis Fencing Club | 1665 | 2500 | 874.2 | 78% |