2023 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SENIC Lucas 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 61%
2 NGUYEN martin 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70%
3 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 22%
3 CHEN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 54% 14%
5 RAJ Jay 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 49%
6 ELKOUSY Zain al Din 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 11%
7 WANDJI Noah 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 34% 6%
8 KO Caleb 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 16% 2%
9 LO Preston 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
10 CHEN Hanson 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
11 LE Jacob H. 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 31%
12 LOZANO Veyron Jericho 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 52% 11%
13 CHANG Eric Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 26% 3%
14 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
15 MAZAHERI Fletcher 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 7%
16 LI Daniel 100% 94% 62% 23% 4% - -
17 DESERANNO Leander 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 10%
18 ZHAO Adam 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 63%
19 LI Bradley 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 40%
20 CHANG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 49% 13%
21 ONG Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 4%
22 FEDELI Francesco 100% 100% 98% 82% 45% 10%
23 BORG Matthew 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 10%
24 CHOI Benjamin 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 9%
25 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 100% 98% 82% 45% 12% 1%
26 PARKER Isaiah 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
27 GE Felix Fei 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 5%
28 ZHAO Nathan 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 47% 8%
29 LU Kevin 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 40%
30 PAN Ethan 100% 99% 85% 50% 15% 1%
31 CHENG Logan 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
32 HE Ian 100% 93% 65% 27% 5% -
33 LU Alex 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
34 LI Edison M. 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 16% 2%
35 DENG David 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 16% 1%
36 YANG Charles 100% 100% 97% 78% 38% 7%
37 LI Lucas 100% 97% 77% 39% 11% 1%
38 YE Jerry 100% 85% 46% 14% 2% -
39 WU Thomas 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 2% -
40 YANG Steve 100% 97% 74% 34% 7% 1% -
41 HUANG Nathan 100% 100% 92% 63% 25% 4% -
42 YANG Tate 100% 98% 86% 54% 18% 2% -
43 GUO Austin 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% - -
44 KIM Gene 100% 100% 94% 71% 32% 6% -
45 CHENG Mason 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% - -
46 HE Bourne 100% 81% 41% 12% 2% -
46 ZHENG Marcus 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5%
48 TSOI Spencer 100% 98% 82% 48% 15% 2%
49 MCKEE Calvin 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% -
50 BIELER Mason 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 12%
51 PARK William 100% 98% 85% 52% 16% 2%
52 GRUNENWALD Henri 100% 70% 25% 4% - -
53 CHANG Jeremy 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 13% 1%
54 CHEN Anson 100% 98% 84% 50% 17% 2% -
55 XU Nathan 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 12% 1%
56 KIM Andrew 100% 98% 79% 40% 11% 2% -
57 PLUMMER Waylon 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 19% 2%
58 FUKUDA Brando 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
59 JIN Andy 100% 99% 85% 50% 15% 1%
60 HUYNH Matthew 100% 98% 83% 50% 16% 2%
61 FANG Haoyu 100% 98% 84% 46% 13% 1%
62 POPOKH Luca 100% 70% 21% 3% - -
63 ZHANG Yankai 100% 98% 82% 46% 13% 2% -
64 JIN Xuechong Daniel 100% 73% 30% 7% 1% -
65 LATORRE Leonardo 100% 99% 87% 54% 17% 2%
66 KUANG Cyrus 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 7% 1%
67 SU Desmond 100% 99% 88% 54% 17% 2% -
68 CHEN Jason 100% 96% 71% 31% 7% 1% -
69 WEI Winston 100% 94% 66% 27% 5% - -
70 LEE Abin 100% 93% 60% 22% 4% - -
71 JACOB Ezra 100% 69% 23% 4% - -
72 SU Preston 100% 85% 47% 15% 2% -
73 ALVAREZ Sebastian 100% 69% 26% 5% - - -
74 ZENG Albert 100% 92% 61% 22% 4% - -
75 FRANCIS Max 100% 89% 56% 20% 4% - -
76 KIAYIAS Alexander 100% 81% 40% 10% 1% - -
77 CHIANG Aiden 100% 48% 10% 1% - - -
78 DIMINO Kartik 100% 90% 49% 14% 2% - -
79 FRANCIS Seb 100% 96% 73% 34% 8% 1%
80 ZHENG Lerui 100% 71% 29% 6% 1% -
81 ALI Adam 100% 44% 8% 1% - - -
82 YOO Christian 100% 82% 44% 13% 2% - -
83 LAM Kirin 100% 40% 7% 1% - -
84 VERDEJO-BUISSON Nicolas 100% 56% 16% 2% - - -
84 DISPENZA Jayan 100% 42% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.