Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | CAO Donald | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
| 3 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 5 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 6 | KROON Landon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 7 | BOSITA Brennan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 8 | GU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 9 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 10 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 11 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 12 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 13 | MOORE Greyson | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | ROH Jaden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 5% | |
| 16 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 17 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | GRABOWSKI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 8% |
| 19 | ZHAO Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | LIN Alex | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 21 | KAUL Ishaan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% | |
| 22 | SRIVATSAV Ishaan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 23 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 24 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | SIDDAMSHETTY Ishaan | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KIM Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | LI Huangziyue | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% | |
| 28 | SRIVATSAV Anay | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 30 | VO Blake | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 31 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | LU Simon | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | SALMAN Ibrahim | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | JEONG JUNWOO | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 36 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | SRA Nawab | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | JI Derek | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | STYS Owen | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | WANG Luke | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | MAI Ryan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | KAMURA Kosei | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | CHAN Troy | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 95% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | DENG Richard | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 48 | HOLMES Xavier | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 49 | SHARMA Ayaan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | DING Orlando | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | BACK SEUNGWOO | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | LI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 54 | EDELBROCK Beckett | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DEGUZMAN Miguel Javier | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | QI Zach | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | WELCH Jackson | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | SHANKAR Rahm | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | RAJ Adithya | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.