John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | QIAN Jason H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 2 | MOHAMED Amir | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | LEE Jacob | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | MOHAMED Murad | V D V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 5 | HE Xiangrui | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | PARRISH Evan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 7 | LOVE Aaron | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | ORLOV Dmitriy | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 9 | SAGE Michael P. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 10 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 11 | MARISI Gabriel | D V V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 12 | YOON Junhyeok | V D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | EMENHEISER Conrad | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | WANG Brayden | V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | WANG Winston | V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | MAO Lucas | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | JIANG Bowang | V D D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | ZAIDI Adil | D V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 19 | SHENG Dalton | V V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | TANG August L. | D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 21 | TANG Alexander L. | V D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 22 | PAZ Luis | V D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | SEMP Iain | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | D V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | FAN Yuchen | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | PRUT Anton | D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 27 | YU William | D D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | BOKAM Dhruva | D V V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 29 | DAFFRON Quintin | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | MILES Greyson | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | MILLER Jonathan | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 31 | LIU hangda | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | DANIZ FERNANDO A. | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 34 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 35 | MITCHELL Henry | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | HARWOOD Gray | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 37 | TAYLOR Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 38 | BOCKSNICK John Robert | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 39 | CANADY Isaac | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | HARKINS Asher | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.