John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
| 2 | MOHAMED Amir | - | - | - | - | 5% | 40% | 55% |
| 3 | LEE Jacob | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 25% |
| 3 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 5 | HE Xiangrui | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | PARRISH Evan | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 7 | LOVE Aaron | - | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% | |
| 8 | ORLOV Dmitriy | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% |
| 9 | SAGE Michael P. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 55% | 27% |
| 10 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 11 | MARISI Gabriel | 9% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | YOON Junhyeok | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | EMENHEISER Conrad | - | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% |
| 14 | WANG Brayden | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 15 | WANG Winston | - | - | 5% | 28% | 49% | 18% | |
| 16 | MAO Lucas | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 24% | 3% | |
| 17 | JIANG Bowang | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% |
| 18 | ZAIDI Adil | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SHENG Dalton | - | - | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | TANG August L. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 21 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | PAZ Luis | 4% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | SEMP Iain | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | FAN Yuchen | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | PRUT Anton | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | YU William | 4% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | BOKAM Dhruva | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 29 | DAFFRON Quintin | 13% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | MILES Greyson | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 31 | MILLER Jonathan | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | LIU hangda | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | DANIZ FERNANDO A. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | 2% | 21% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | MITCHELL Henry | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | HARWOOD Gray | 13% | 50% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | TAYLOR Benjamin | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BOCKSNICK John Robert | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | CANADY Isaac | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | HARKINS Asher | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.