John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% |
2 | RACHEL Dylan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% | |
3 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 20% | |
3 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
5 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
6 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
7 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
8 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
9 | JACKSON James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
10 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
11 | DINKINS Shuayb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
12 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
13 | SCHARF Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
14 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
15 | TOUSSAINT Semaj | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
16 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
17 | LIN Kason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
18 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
19 | SLOUGH Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 10% |
20 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
21 | WALLACE James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
22 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
23 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
24 | ALLEY Everett T | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
25 | HULL Liam | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
26 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
27 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
28 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
29 | SNYDER Ari | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
30 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
31 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
32 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | SAKO Ayrton J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
34 | RAVI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
35 | CARNALL Hunter | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
36 | KUO Garrett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
37 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | YI Nathan | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
39 | HAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
40 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
41 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
42 | CHUNG Joseph | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
43 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
44 | MARKOWITZ Sam | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
45 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
46 | PAL Ian K. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
47 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
47 | DAN Rex | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
49 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
50 | PATEL Shloke | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
51 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
52 | REDDY Daksh | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
53 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
54 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
55 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 2% |
56 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
57 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
58 | ODEA Ryan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
59 | ZHU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
60 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
61 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
62 | DINKINS Adam | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
63 | BETTS Kieran | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | LAM Bill | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
65 | FARRER Brennecke E | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.