Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
| 3 | FENG Shang | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 3 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
| 5 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 6 | SONG Changze | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 7 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 8 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 9 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 10 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 11 | ALEXANDER Christopher | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
| 12 | OCONNOR Paul | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 14 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 15 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 16 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 19 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 20 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 21 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | |
| 22 | BO Genero | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 23 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 24 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 25 | HAN Keyi | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 10% | - |
| 28 | GU Eric | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | WU Matthew | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 30 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | ZHAI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 36 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MCGANN Grant | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | SHI Evan | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.