Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KO Caleb | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Hanru | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | |
| 3 | HOU Gaven | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 3 | CHENG Logan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 45% | |
| 5 | REN Ryan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 47% |
| 6 | XU Nathan | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
| 7 | JIN Andy | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
| 8 | WU Wallace | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 9 | WANG George | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 10 | AHMAD Uzayr | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 11 | CHANG Parker | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 5% | |
| 12 | WANG Luke | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 13 | LI Andrew | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | TIAN Andy | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 16 | ZHAO David | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | WU Alexander | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 18 | LI Jayden | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | HU Daniel | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | SPERBER Miles | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEUNG Jayden | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | MA Matthew | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | BU Ethan | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | |
| 23 | ZHONG Kingsley | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | HU Michael | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZHANG Ethan | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | YANG David H. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | HAN Jiaren | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 30 | WANG Joshua | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | LIU Yilin | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 32 | ZHONG Albert | 42% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | CONNELLY Malcolm | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 34 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | GLODE Russell | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 36 | DAWSON Myer | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | SUN Nathan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 38 | TIAN Dylan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | HU Weijie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 40 | ROPER Griffin | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LEE Aeden | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | SUN Andrew | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ROSENTHAL Hugh | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | FANG Ryan | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.