San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MARSH-SENIC Ann E. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% | |
2 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
3 | SEAL Julie T. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
3 | BASSIK Judith M. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | < 1% |
5 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
6 | VASHISHT Suparna | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 1% | |
7 | CHAPMAN Lesley F. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 42% | 9% |
8 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
9 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 1% | |
10 | KERR Margaret E. | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
11 | FAGAN Margaret | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
12 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
13 | THURMAN Allison L. | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
14 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
15 | DREYER Nadia S. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
16 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 11% | 38% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
17 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
18 | LEE Claire L. | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
19 | MORRISON Monica L. | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
20 | CHACE-ORTIZ Naneen | 48% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.