Pasadena Convention Center - Main Ballroom - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 2 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 3 | ONG Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 5 | BIELER Mason | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 6 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 16% |
| 7 | CHANG Jeremy | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 8 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 9 | ZHANG Yankai | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | HARRIS Hayden | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 11 | HONG Edwin | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
| 12 | ZHOU Shawn | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 42% |
| 13 | LI Daniel | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 14 | YE Jerry | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 15 | LI Lucas | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 16 | HUANG Nathan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 38% | 7% |
| 17 | GOERDEL Hitchens | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | CHEN Jason | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% | |
| 19 | KO Darren | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 20 | MAO Runxian | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 21 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 22 | LEE Joshua | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% |
| 24 | TANG Brayden | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 26 | JACOB Ezra | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 27 | JEON Joohun | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | XU Ethan | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | LEE Abin | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | CHEN Solomon | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | SAFTA Aidan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 33 | WANG Eason | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PARK Kaiden | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 2% | |
| 35 | TURBAT Travis | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | SUN Roy | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 37 | FOO Kingston | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | FECK Shayne | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | LITVACK Jackson | 18% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SHEN Alaric | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | LIU Landon | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MA Justin | 12% | 47% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | CHAPLUK Thomas | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | PARRA Lucas | 3% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | TAN benjamin | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | CHENG Alvin | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | RAMKUMAR Eeshan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | YOUABIAN Liam | - | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KWONG Colin | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | YUNG Brandon | 39% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | FECK Noah | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | ULZIIBOLD Sean | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | NGUYEN James | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | TRAN Andrew | < 1% | 6% | 30% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LEE Colin | 6% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | CHOI Theodore | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 59 | SUTTON Alexander (AJ) | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | HAYS Asher | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LE Oliver | 25% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.