Olympian Fencing Club - San Antonio, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THAYER Jake T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% |
| 2 | KRAMER Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 3 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% |
| 3 | FEINGERSCH Ariav (Ari) B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | |
| 5 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 6 | HURME Tommi K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 28% |
| 7 | HOLCOMB Wesley | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 8 | YOUNG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% |
| 9 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 2% | - |
| 10 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 11 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 12 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 15% |
| 13 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% | |
| 14 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | NEAL John P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
| 16 | BOURDEAU Emily B. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | FRENCH Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 87% | 50% | 13% | |
| 18 | SOOS Whitman | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 20 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | ELLISOR Drayten | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | HAWLEY Justin | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 23 | QUINTANILLA Danielle A. | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% | |
| 25 | PEREZ Daniel | 100% | 87% | 46% | 10% | - | - | |
| 26 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | HENTOSH Pierce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 28 | WHITE Derrek W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 29 | COHEN Nathan | 100% | 93% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | PEREZ Vicente | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MORRIS Quentin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LESCURE Dimitri | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | NGUYEN Khanh | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 34 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 75% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | BARTON Christian | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | REHUREK Luke | 100% | 95% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | SADLER Daniel | 100% | 98% | 75% | 22% | - | - | |
| 38 | LU Haoyang | 100% | 87% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BRUMMETT Anna | 100% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 40 | KELLEY Cathy A. | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.