Pasadena Convention Center - Main Ballroom - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LING Eddie | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
2 | LE Jacob H. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
3 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
3 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 24% |
5 | LIN Youlong | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 37% |
6 | MA Andrew | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 32% |
7 | LIN Xilong | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
8 | ZHANG Jacob | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
9 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
10 | PARK Sky | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
11 | NAVARRO Kato | 1% | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
12 | MORROW Brenden | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
13 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
14 | BERMAN Michael | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
15 | GOBBO Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 15% | |
16 | LI Richard | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
17 | LLIDO Soren | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
18 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
19 | NGUYEN Liam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% |
20 | OROPEZA David | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
21 | PARK Rion | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
22 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 39% |
23 | CHANG Nathan | - | 5% | 43% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
24 | KETTELLE John | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
25 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
26 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
27 | YI William | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
28 | PONS Diego | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
29 | CHOI Ethan | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
30 | CHOI Ethan | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
31 | BARTSCH Henry | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
32 | WONG Evan | - | - | 9% | 36% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
33 | LIU William | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
34 | ZHOU Ryan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
35 | AGRAWAL Niki | - | 1% | 17% | 45% | 31% | 6% | - |
36 | BAE Eugene | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
37 | FLANAGAN Miles | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | TUAN Evan | - | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
39 | LING Carson Jr | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% |
42 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
43 | SMITH Jeremiah | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
45 | LI Jett | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
46 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
47 | CHAN Joseph | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
48 | ORNELAS Matteo | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | MA Bryant | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
50 | BORG Matthew | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
51 | TSOI Spencer | 1% | 15% | 53% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
52 | BAKER Ethan | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
53 | DENG David | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
54 | ATTIA Aly | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
55 | YUAN Jonathan | 22% | 66% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
56 | PE Noah | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
57 | ZHAN Kevin | 27% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
58 | KUO Jayden | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | YORK Lucas | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | LEE Christopher | 23% | 59% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | ROSE Jacob W. | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | TSAO Holden | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
63 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 39% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
63 | TURNER Finian | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | PEREZ Carlos Josemaria | 7% | 57% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
66 | WANG Matthew | 62% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
67 | PERALTA RODRIGUEZ Niko | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
68 | DROPKIN Mason | 71% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.