Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 2 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 3 | LU Samantha R. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
| 5 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 6 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 7 | ZHU Serene M. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 8 | GUJJA Misha | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 9 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 10 | FURMAN Maria | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 12 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 13 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 14 | YOU Emily | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 15 | YANG Alisa | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 16 | QIU Emily | 1% | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 18 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | ILYAS Ayah | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | CHI Chelsea | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 22 | ZOLDAK Mary | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 23 | PEELER Julia | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | NOH Rachel | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 26 | DONGES Anna | - | 4% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | BARDIN Kira | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | MUELLER Polo | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
| 29 | MAGALSKI Mary | 3% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | RHEINECKER Claire | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | KRISHNA Rithika | 44% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | BOWIE Charlotta | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 34 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | ZHANG ANGELA | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HE Lizbeth | 15% | 49% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LAMBERT Camille L. | 14% | 45% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | DAVIS Shanna | 42% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | HART Jenna | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.