Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LABROZZI Aidan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 2 | KUCIA Michael J. | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | PAYNE Gareth | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Eli | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 5 | CHA Patrick | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | KIM Daniel | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | REDDY Daksh | V V V D D V | V V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 8 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | D D D V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 10 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 11 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | TUCKER Evan | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | KONG Chuizheng | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 15 | HONG Robin | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | LEE Daehyeon | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | JAAFAR Hamza | V V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 18 | MARSHALL Wesley | V V V V V D | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 19 | JUNG Elliot | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | SOPER Adam | D D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 21 | ZHOU Alex | D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | PATEL Krishiv | V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | SOTTILE Cole | V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 24 | MA Bochen | D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | THUN William | D D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | NAM Nathaniel | D V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | PARK Andrew | D V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 28 | BILLARD Julien | D V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 29 | TURK Reggie | D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 30 | TOWNS jordan | D V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 31 | LEE Winston | V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 32 | MCDANIEL Eamon | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 33 | KRIEGER Jack | V D V V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 34 | WILFORD Madigan | V V D D V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 35 | GREEN Marvin | V D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 36 | MAYO Candler | D V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 37 | ZIELINSKI Alexander E. | V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 38 | JEONG Arisu | D V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 39 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | V D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 40 | ATON Dave | D V V D D V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 41 | RIGSBEE Rachel | D V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 42 | ROBINSON Blake | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 43 | MCCUBBINS Tyler | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 44 | ROBERTS Quinton | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 45 | SANDERS Charlotte | V V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 46 | PAK Joel | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 47 | LEE Aaron | V V D D D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 48 | DOUGLAS John | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 49 | FORD Austin | D V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 50 | EDWARDS Darby | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 51 | SILVA Daniel | D D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 52 | PETE Landon | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | HICKS Matthew | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 54 | WATKINS James | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 55 | ARZT Nicholas | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 56 | MOSS Riley | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 57 | HAWKINS Sophia | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 58 | JACKSON Viktoria | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 60 | RUSCONI Jane | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.