Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 2 | KUCIA Michael J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | PAYNE Gareth | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Eli | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 5 | CHA Patrick | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | KIM Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 7 | REDDY Daksh | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 8 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 10 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 11 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
| 12 | TUCKER Evan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | KONG Chuizheng | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 15 | HONG Robin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | LEE Daehyeon | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | JAAFAR Hamza | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | MARSHALL Wesley | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 19 | JUNG Elliot | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | SOPER Adam | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% |
| 21 | ZHOU Alex | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 22 | PATEL Krishiv | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | |
| 23 | SOTTILE Cole | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | MA Bochen | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% | |
| 25 | THUN William | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | NAM Nathaniel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | PARK Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | BILLARD Julien | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 29 | TURK Reggie | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 30 | TOWNS jordan | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | LEE Winston | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 33 | KRIEGER Jack | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 34 | WILFORD Madigan | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
| 35 | GREEN Marvin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | MAYO Candler | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | ZIELINSKI Alexander E. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 38 | JEONG Arisu | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 39 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ATON Dave | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 41 | RIGSBEE Rachel | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | ROBINSON Blake | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 43 | MCCUBBINS Tyler | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 44 | ROBERTS Quinton | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SANDERS Charlotte | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | PAK Joel | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 47 | LEE Aaron | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 48 | DOUGLAS John | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | FORD Austin | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 50 | EDWARDS Darby | 1% | 8% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | SILVA Daniel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 52 | PETE Landon | 9% | 41% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | HICKS Matthew | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | WATKINS James | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ARZT Nicholas | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 56 | MOSS Riley | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | HAWKINS Sophia | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | JACKSON Viktoria | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | RUSCONI Jane | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.