Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HABBOUB Qusai | - | - | 6% | 48% | 46% | |
| 2 | GNEUHS Sam | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 42% | 12% |
| 3 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 54% |
| 3 | BOYKO Miles | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 18% |
| 5 | ZHAO Bowen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 6 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | - | - | 7% | 38% | 54% | |
| 7 | COPELAND Nigel | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 39% | 9% |
| 8 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 9 | DENMAN Matthew L. | - | 4% | 30% | 56% | 10% | |
| 10 | BASSIK Eva | - | 1% | 17% | 50% | 32% | |
| 11 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | 2% | 21% | 53% | 22% | 2% | |
| 12 | MATLIN Mark | 29% | 47% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | LAKAS Darius | 24% | 46% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | HICKEY Connor | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | DUNLAP Ian | 4% | 28% | 50% | 17% | 1% | |
| 16 | PRIJATEL John R. | 21% | 62% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | JAMES John | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 18 | SIDARAS John | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | GOMEZ Leo | 23% | 47% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | ROOT-THOMPSON Kiah O. | 18% | 46% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
| 21 | HAAS Zane | 57% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 22 | CUNNINGHAM Kaleigh | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.