Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HABBOUB Qusai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 46% | |
| 2 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 12% |
| 3 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
| 3 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 18% |
| 5 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
| 6 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | |
| 7 | COPELAND Nigel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | 9% |
| 8 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 9 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 10% | |
| 10 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 32% | |
| 11 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 24% | 2% | |
| 12 | MATLIN Mark | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | LAKAS Darius | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 14 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 96% | 68% | 18% | 1% | |
| 16 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 79% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | JAMES John | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 18 | SIDARAS John | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | GOMEZ Leo | 100% | 77% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | ROOT-THOMPSON Kiah O. | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 21 | HAAS Zane | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | |
| 22 | CUNNINGHAM Kaleigh | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.