Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOUSSAINT Semaj | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
| 2 | MOORE Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
| 3 | VICK Ethan | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 1% | |
| 5 | KIM Emily | 16% | 45% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 6 | DAVIS Ian | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 7 | GOEDICKE Elway | - | 1% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | BERNSTEIN Alex | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | XU Yueran | 1% | 12% | 38% | 42% | 7% | - | - |
| 10 | KARLEKAR Veer | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | JONES Gideon | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | - | |
| 12 | GOCHBERG Madeline | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 13 | ZIMMERMAN Karmen | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.