Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
2 | FARQUHARSON Cole | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
3 | YU Anders | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% |
3 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
5 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
6 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
7 | WANG Andrew | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 10% |
8 | SWEENEY Quinn | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
9 | HODESS Ethan | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 31% | 5% |
10 | CLAY Jacob M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
11 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | - | - | 7% | 34% | 59% |
12 | MILLER Duncan R. | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% |
13 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
14 | BARTH Gavin M. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
16 | WU Conrad J. | 5% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | KIM Derek A. | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | - |
18 | HOU Kenneth | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
19 | CHEN Wilson | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
20 | NG Eben S. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
21 | STIAGUN Nikita | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
22 | PEREZ Joseph | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
23 | WOMACH Tristan | 25% | 49% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
24 | JEFFERY Jakob | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
25 | MILLER Chance | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
27 | HUANG Bernard | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
28 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
28 | NAM Michael | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.