Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
2 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
3 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
3 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 5% |
5 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
6 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
7 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 10% |
8 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
9 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 5% |
10 | CLAY Jacob M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
11 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
12 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 5% |
13 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
14 | BARTH Gavin M. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
15 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
16 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - |
17 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - |
18 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
19 | CHEN Wilson | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
20 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
21 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
22 | PEREZ Joseph | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
23 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
24 | JEFFERY Jakob | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
25 | MILLER Chance | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - |
27 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
28 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
28 | NAM Michael | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.