Birmingham Fencing Club - Hoover, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 2 | PATEL Kushal | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | KRAFFT Douglas | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% |
| 5 | CARRIE Konnor | - | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | |
| 6 | FORD Tillman | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | LIU Elinda | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 8 | ALLEY Everett T | - | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% |
| 9 | SKOWRONSKI Alexander | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | WILLIAMS Eli | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 11 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
| 12 | ARMISTEAD Jack Riley | - | - | 1% | 10% | 53% | 36% |
| 13 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | SOPER Adam | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | WYNN Paul | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 16 | BROWN Hannah | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 17 | CALINSKY Edward | 1% | 28% | 45% | 23% | 3% | |
| 18 | BROWN Matt | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | RESTER Christopher | 1% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 5% | |
| 20 | CLEMONS Adder | 11% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | DUNKLIN Devon | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | MOYNIHAN Jones | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | RAY William | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 34% | |
| 24 | CORDOVA Colin | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LIU Yunhao | 7% | 50% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | HALVERSON Spencer | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | HAAS Lindsey | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 28 | BELCHER Marleigh | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | MASRI Rania | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.