Culver Academies - Culver, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YAN Jack P. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | V V V | V V V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | RESHEIDAT Malik | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 5 | LIU Edward H. | V V | V V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 6 | NIETO Jacob | V V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 7 | KILBOURNE Lance | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | LEVSKY Benjamin | V V D D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 9 | HAM Kevin P. | V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 10 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 11 | CELADINA Charles C. | V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | MURZYN III Cj | V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | LIU Jonathan M. | D V | V V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 14 | MCMAHON Brendan | V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | PINTO Gabriel R. | D V V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 16 | VILLARREAL Mateo | V D V | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 17 | GRIFFITH Joseph | V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | ERVIN William T. | D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 19 | KELLY Nicko | D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | BIRKS Evan D. | V D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 21 | WINEBURNER J.T. | V V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | LU Evan | D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 23 | PARKER Timothy S. | V V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 24 | HUBBARD Wyatt | D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 25 | CHAMBERS Joshua A. | V D D V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 27 | YOO Steve | D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 28 | CHAN Jacob | V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 32 | URY Barret | D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 34 | KOKKIN Jack S. | V D V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
| 35 | HILLYER Ryan | V D V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 37 | RICHARDSON Gabriel A. | V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | SKATKOV Eduard | V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 44 | KIEDROWSKI Alex | D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 48 | SHEN Christopher | D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 49 | LARSON John | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 50 | TUCKER Gabriel | D D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 52 | BERN Brendan T. | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 54 | PASTER Eli | D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 57 | MANDEL Jackson | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 58 | FOUNTAIN Gavin | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 60 | CHENG Albert | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 62 | ENNIS Ronnie | D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 63 | BENNING Conor | D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 66 | BALLAD Alexander | D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 68 | CHAVEZ Demetrio | D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.