Culver Academies - Culver, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAN Jack P. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 2 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% | |||
| 3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | - | 1% | 13% | 51% | 36% | ||
| 3 | RESHEIDAT Malik | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
| 5 | LIU Edward H. | 12% | 74% | 14% | ||||
| 6 | NIETO Jacob | 2% | 26% | 48% | 24% | |||
| 7 | KILBOURNE Lance | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 8 | LEVSKY Benjamin | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 9 | HAM Kevin P. | 11% | 37% | 40% | 12% | |||
| 10 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | - | 8% | 43% | 48% | |||
| 11 | CELADINA Charles C. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | ||
| 12 | MURZYN III Cj | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 13 | LIU Jonathan M. | 4% | 32% | 65% | ||||
| 14 | MCMAHON Brendan | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | ||
| 15 | PINTO Gabriel R. | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | |||
| 16 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 8% | 36% | 42% | 14% | |||
| 17 | GRIFFITH Joseph | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% | |
| 18 | ERVIN William T. | 25% | 46% | 26% | 4% | |||
| 19 | KELLY Nicko | 2% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 6% | ||
| 20 | BIRKS Evan D. | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LU Evan | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 2% | ||
| 23 | PARKER Timothy S. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 24 | HUBBARD Wyatt | 66% | 31% | 3% | ||||
| 25 | CHAMBERS Joshua A. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | YOO Steve | 15% | 41% | 35% | 9% | |||
| 28 | CHAN Jacob | 5% | 27% | 46% | 23% | |||
| 32 | URY Barret | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | KOKKIN Jack S. | 5% | 27% | 45% | 24% | |||
| 35 | HILLYER Ryan | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% | ||
| 37 | RICHARDSON Gabriel A. | 7% | 35% | 43% | 15% | |||
| 38 | SKATKOV Eduard | 3% | 34% | 54% | 9% | |||
| 44 | KIEDROWSKI Alex | 22% | 45% | 28% | 5% | |||
| 48 | SHEN Christopher | 6% | 30% | 45% | 19% | |||
| 49 | LARSON John | 8% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | TUCKER Gabriel | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | BERN Brendan T. | 3% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 54 | PASTER Eli | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | ||
| 57 | MANDEL Jackson | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 58 | FOUNTAIN Gavin | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 60 | CHENG Albert | 19% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | ||
| 62 | ENNIS Ronnie | 20% | 57% | 21% | 2% | |||
| 63 | BENNING Conor | 19% | 47% | 29% | 5% | - | ||
| 66 | BALLAD Alexander | 26% | 48% | 23% | 3% | |||
| 68 | CHAVEZ Demetrio | 19% | 43% | 31% | 7% | |||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.