The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FUNG Emma | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
2 | DO Leila | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
3 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% | |
3 | PENG Serena | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
5 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
6 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
7 | LUH Mia P. | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
8 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
9 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
10 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
10 | PATTERSON Natalia | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
12 | CUI Alivia | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
13 | WANG Celine S. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
14 | ZHANG Ivy | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
15 | FRANK Lauren | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
16 | XIE Su | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
17 | BHATT Morgane | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
18 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
19 | GUAN Adeline | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
20 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
21 | EDWARDS Darby | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
22 | SEAL Cameron I. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
23 | MCKAY Teresa | 5% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | CHOI Sophie | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
25 | SEN Arjen | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
26 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
27 | KULKARNI myra | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.