The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DEANS Donovan | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.9 | 5 | -0.9 |
| 2 | CHEN Howard | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | MULLENNIX Ethan M. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 3 | HWANG Jayden | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | RAMANAN Govind | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | BYON Julian | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | BYON Adrian | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 8 | SUORSA Markus | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 9 | KANG Evan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | TSE Aiden J | D V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | V D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | CHOW William T. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | YANG Dylan | D V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D V V D V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 15 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | V D D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | LEE Noah | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | POFF Kainoa | V V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | WONG Lucas | V V D D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | CHAN Henry | V V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | LIN Daniel | V D V D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 21 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | V D V V V D | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 21 | TAN Ryan | V V V V D D | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
| 23 | HO Anson | V V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 24 | GAY Jono | V D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | V D D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 26 | KROON Lucas | V D V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 27 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | V D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | BERMENDER Cameron | D D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | TUNG Ryan | V V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | LI Li | D D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | ANUMULA Aryan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 32 | HOLZ Lucas | D D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 33 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | D V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 34 | IYER Neil | D V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 35 | OLARIO Raphael | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 36 | VO Landon | D D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 37 | WANG HongXi | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 37 | MATHUR Ativ | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 39 | WONG David | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 40 | LI Seth | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 41 | LE Long | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 42 | FLINN Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.