The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DEANS Donovan | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
2 | CHEN Howard | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
3 | MULLENNIX Ethan M. | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
3 | HWANG Jayden | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
5 | RAMANAN Govind | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
6 | BYON Julian | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
7 | BYON Adrian | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
8 | SUORSA Markus | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
9 | KANG Evan | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
10 | TSE Aiden J | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | - |
11 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
12 | CHOW William T. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
13 | YANG Dylan | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% | - |
14 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
15 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
16 | LEE Noah | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 1% |
17 | POFF Kainoa | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
18 | WONG Lucas | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | CHAN Henry | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
20 | LIN Daniel | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | 1% |
21 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
21 | TAN Ryan | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | HO Anson | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
24 | GAY Jono | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
25 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
26 | KROON Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
27 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
28 | BERMENDER Cameron | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | TUNG Ryan | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
30 | LI Li | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
31 | ANUMULA Aryan | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
32 | HOLZ Lucas | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
34 | IYER Neil | 20% | 45% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
35 | OLARIO Raphael | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
36 | VO Landon | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
37 | WANG HongXi | 8% | 34% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
37 | MATHUR Ativ | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | WONG David | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | LI Seth | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | LE Long | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
42 | FLINN Ryan | 33% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.