USC PED North Gym - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | V V V V | V V V V V | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 2 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | V D V D | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 3 | CHIEN Brandon | V D V D | V V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 5 | LIN Kyran | V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 6 | MUSGRAVE Walter N. | V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 7 | WU Ian Y. | V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | EVERS Gabriel | D V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 9 | PAK Elliot | V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | SHUR Yakov C. | D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Terrill D. | D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 12 | CROSSMAN Brandon | V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 13 | MUNOZ Humberto | D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 14 | NIXON Mark | V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 15 | SHAHRIL Natalia | D V D V | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark | D V V D | V V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 17 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 18 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 19 | FERRIERE Joshua | V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | JU Hanul | V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | AU Marcus J. | V V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | SWANSON Ronan J. | V V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 23 | LIU Yueri | D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 24 | JENSEN David | V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 25 | MENDOZA Zandro | V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | BELL Michael S. | V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | HAU Olivia | D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | ALLEN David | D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | KIM Michael | V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | CHAO Warren | D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | KIM Remington | D D D V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 33 | WELBORN Kathrina | V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 34 | FERRIERE Thomas | D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | ITO WILSON Miles | D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 36 | CREASON Nicholas | V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | TAN Jocelyn | D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 38 | LEON Miguel | D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | GALLIVAN James | D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 39 | VASILYEVA Nadia | D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 41 | HUANG Tony | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | BEAVER Nathaniel | D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 43 | KHOO Mason | D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 44 | CAO Vincent | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 45 | TAMIR Annika | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.