USC PED North Gym - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 2 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 3 | CHIEN Brandon | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 22% |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zachari | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
| 5 | LIN Kyran | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 6 | MUSGRAVE Walter N. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 7 | WU Ian Y. | - | 2% | 19% | 46% | 33% |
| 8 | EVERS Gabriel | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 9 | PAK Elliot | - | 7% | 34% | 46% | 13% |
| 10 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | 5% | 38% | 57% |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Terrill D. | - | 3% | 37% | 48% | 12% |
| 12 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 4% | 22% | 42% | 29% | 4% |
| 13 | MUNOZ Humberto | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 24% |
| 14 | NIXON Mark | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 17% |
| 15 | SHAHRIL Natalia | 9% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | 5% | 35% | 60% |
| 18 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 1% | 10% | 36% | 42% | 11% |
| 19 | FERRIERE Joshua | 8% | 51% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 20 | JU Hanul | 2% | 17% | 42% | 35% | 4% |
| 21 | AU Marcus J. | - | 2% | 19% | 55% | 24% |
| 22 | SWANSON Ronan J. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | LIU Yueri | 24% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 24 | JENSEN David | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 25 | MENDOZA Zandro | - | 5% | 43% | 44% | 8% |
| 26 | BELL Michael S. | 10% | 41% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | HAU Olivia | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 28 | ALLEN David | 14% | 54% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KIM Michael | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | CHAO Warren | - | 3% | 55% | 39% | 3% |
| 31 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
| 32 | KIM Remington | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | - |
| 33 | WELBORN Kathrina | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | FERRIERE Thomas | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | ITO WILSON Miles | 8% | 73% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CREASON Nicholas | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 37 | TAN Jocelyn | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | LEON Miguel | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | GALLIVAN James | 90% | 10% | - | - | - |
| 39 | VASILYEVA Nadia | 5% | 53% | 36% | 6% | - |
| 41 | HUANG Tony | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 41 | BEAVER Nathaniel | 10% | 40% | 41% | 8% | - |
| 43 | KHOO Mason | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | CAO Vincent | 27% | 46% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 45 | TAMIR Annika | 14% | 54% | 27% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.