VT RecSports Field House - Blacksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODLEY Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 2 | DIMMETT David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% |
| 5 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 6 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 7 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 8 | BRENNAN Quinlan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 9 | SAKO Ayrton J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 20% |
| 11 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 12 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 3% |
| 13 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 14 | NORWOOD Malik | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 2% |
| 15 | LE TAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
| 16 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 17 | MILLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 18 | SCHAPIRO Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 19 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 20 | DEMAREE Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 21 | ZALEWSKI David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 7% |
| 22 | LAM Bill | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | GRESHAM Sarah L. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ANDERSON Derek M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 25 | WALLACE George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | WALLACE James | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | TANG Justin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WEIKEL Joel | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WHITE Myles | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | MONTESI Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 33 | KELLOFF Michael | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 34 | HERMES Henry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 35 | SCHICKEL Juliana | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | VESSELS Susan L. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 1% |
| 39 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SINGH Jawand | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | BLUM Oliver | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 42 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | 1% |
| 43 | FEAGIN Patrick | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | KEIM Spencer | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | VESSELS Aaron | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | MOORE Mary | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | DIX Philip-Alexander | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | BADLANI Neel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SCHIANO Sofia | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | SEATON Jake | 100% | 84% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LUNDEN Espen | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | OWENS Osbourne D. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | HAUSER Samuel | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BARRETT John | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.