Brentwood High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% |
| 2 | NAZARIAN Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 3 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
| 3 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 5 | GAUTHIER-PARKER Harrison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 6 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 7 | STAFFORD Bryan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 8 | LEWIS Parker | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 9 | SHIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 10 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 11 | SUH Victor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 12 | THORNTON Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 14% | |
| 13 | SCHERZAY Ian | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | DAO Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | |
| 15 | O'BRIEN Beckett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% |
| 16 | PEÑA Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 17 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% |
| 19 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 20 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | GAINSLEY Isaac | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 22 | STAFFORD Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 24% | |
| 23 | BYRNE Quinlan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 24 | TAKU Mike | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | XU Wangzitai | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 26 | PALMER Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 27 | IYER Pranav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 2% |
| 28 | O'GARA Theodore | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | GODINA Jayden | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | BOTYANSZKI Balint | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | YANAI Charlie | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | WELLS William | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | GUILLERMO Dante | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 34 | CHEN David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | |
| 35 | LIBATIQUE Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
| 36 | COREAS Aaron | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 37 | PROCTER Griffin | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | DILORENZO Peter | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ZAPATA Matthew | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
| 41 | CLARKE Luca | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | LARI Matthew | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 43 | CAMP Ryder | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
| 45 | MURPHY Parker | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 46 | GARCIA Miguel | 100% | 90% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SULLIVAN SALVADOR Antonio | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KAMRAS Ryan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SERAPIO Jose | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 15% | |
| 50 | PALAPA Yair | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 51 | COONEY LEBANO Gideon | 100% | 52% | 8% | - | - | |
| 52 | CALDWELL Sean | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | RAWLINSON Cameron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
| 54 | BISSADA Matthew | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 55 | DONOHUE Angus | 100% | 68% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | BANGAYAN Anthony | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | MONTERROSA Aiscen | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 58 | ROMANA Colin | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 59 | JONES Rodney | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 60 | MCGAHA-SCHLETTER Dashiell | 100% | 68% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | SANDOVAL-CUDE Maxwell | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | KOENIG Caleb | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | JOHNSON Xolani | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.