MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 2 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 3 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 5 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 6 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 8 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
| 10 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 53% | 10% |
| 11 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 12 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 13 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 14 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 15 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 17 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 6% |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 19 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 4% |
| 20 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 21 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 22 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | NARANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 24 | CLOWES Madison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 25 | CHEN Georgia M. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | WANG Ashley | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | WU Celine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 31 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 83% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 34 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 35 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | SILVER Anna | 100% | 61% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | SHAH Aanya | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.