Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | TIRRELL Justin J. | V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 3 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 5 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 6 | CHAWLA Armaan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | YU Jason | D V V V V | V V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 8 | DICKENS Robert W. | D V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 9 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | SO Lorenzo | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | KENYON Benjamin | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | V D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | ASUNCION Arren | V V D D D D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 16 | HULL Liam | D D D V D | V V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 17 | ISERT Sarah | V V V V V D | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | EVANS George | V V V D V V | D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 19 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 20 | ALI Farhan | V D D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | GORDON Rachel A. | D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | POLANICHKA Nicole | V D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | MURPHY Megan | D V V D D V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 24 | COLETTA David | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | KOOB Julian | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | USDIN Anton | D D D V D V | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 27 | WOOLF Fredrika | V D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | LENAR David | D V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | IHRIE Greg H. | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | CHAWLA Aarav | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | KIM Joshua | D D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | MERIWETHER Anne | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | WILKINSON Douglas | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 34 | SAVAGE Austin | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | ORLANDO Janine | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 36 | FORAIDA Khalid | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 37 | PERKINS Zoe | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 38 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.