Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 42% | 6% |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% | |
| 3 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | TIKHONOV Iliya | - | - | 7% | 39% | 45% | 8% | |
| 5 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
| 6 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 5% | |
| 7 | YU Jason | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | DICKENS Robert W. | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
| 9 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
| 10 | SO Lorenzo | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 46% | 12% |
| 11 | KENYON Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 46% | 20% |
| 12 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | - | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 14 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 15 | ASUNCION Arren | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 16 | HULL Liam | 4% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | ISERT Sarah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 18 | EVANS George | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 19 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
| 20 | ALI Farhan | 3% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | GORDON Rachel A. | 4% | 48% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 23 | MURPHY Megan | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | COLETTA David | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | KOOB Julian | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 26 | USDIN Anton | - | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 29% | 5% |
| 27 | WOOLF Fredrika | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | LENAR David | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | IHRIE Greg H. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | CHAWLA Aarav | 3% | 26% | 65% | 7% | - | - | |
| 31 | KIM Joshua | - | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 32 | MERIWETHER Anne | 5% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WILKINSON Douglas | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 34 | SAVAGE Austin | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | ORLANDO Janine | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | FORAIDA Khalid | 1% | 11% | 43% | 39% | 6% | - | - |
| 37 | PERKINS Zoe | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 54% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.