MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU MENGKE | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | HUANG Ethan F. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | WILSON Jude | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | NOBLE Colin | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 6 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | SHOMAN Noah | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D V V V V D | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 9 | OVERDECK Andrew | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 10 | FLOT Tai A. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | DENG Andrew | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | BLEYMAN David | D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 14 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | WANG Robert | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 16 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 17 | ZHENG Edward L. | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | DOWNEY Baran | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | WU Wilmund | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 20 | KOGAN Nikita | V V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 22 | POSY Daniel | V V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 23 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | WANG Oscar | V V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | OKEEFE Mitchell | V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | MOULTON Ian | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | TISHININ Alexander D. | D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | ZHU Shao | D D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 30 | SAVOY Luca | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | V D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 32 | OH Triton | D D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 33 | SHI Erick | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | WU Hunter | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | VOSS Jeffer | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 36 | DEKA Tanush | V D D D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 37 | HOPPA Luke H. | D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 38 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | V D D D V | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 39 | SANDHU Arjan | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 40 | SEN David | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 41 | CHAN Austin | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 42 | LEMPERT Adam | D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 43 | PILAT Matthew J. | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 44 | GILSON Lucas B. | D D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 45 | WASSERMAN Aiden | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 46 | TANG Charles | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 46 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 48 | RAY Arjun | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 49 | LI william | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 50 | SZCZESNY Mikolaj | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.