Team Touché Fencing Center - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PADGITT Tedd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
2 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
3 | LEE Royce | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - | |
3 | HERBRANDSON Luke | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
5 | SOLONOVICH Maksim | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
6 | ROBSON Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
7 | PABLO Jesse | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
8 | PITTMAN Stephen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% | |
9 | SETTE Alessandro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
10 | IRVING David | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
11 | RIDLEY Alan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
12 | ORELUP Austin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
13 | DU Yiwei | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
14 | KEITEL-PANACCIONE Kieran | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
15 | LEON Miguel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 1% | |
16 | WALLIS Wyatt | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
17 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
18 | HERRON Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
19 | MANDEL Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
20 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
21 | CHAO Warren | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
22 | WILLIAMS Timothy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 13% |
23 | LIANG Dong | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
24 | HILLYER Nathan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
25 | FELDMAN Louis | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.