October NAC

Cadet Men's Saber

Friday, October 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LINDER James (Luke) L. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 33% 6%
2 SCHMITT Trenton R. 100% 96% 77% 45% 17% 3% -
3 LORTKIPANIDZE Nickoloz 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 10%
3 CHEN Alan 100% 96% 75% 36% 8% 1%
5 JOHNSON Andrew J. 100% 100% 97% 82% 51% 19% 3%
6 KIM Stephen E. 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 14% 2%
7 CHAN Zachary D. 100% 100% 98% 82% 42% 9% 1%
8 ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 28%
9 PARK Donghwan 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11%
10 GEFELL Andrew P. 100% 100% 100% 94% 69% 28% 4%
11 NADILE Henry V. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
12 KUPANOFF Dimitri N. 100% 100% 98% 84% 44% 9%
13 CHOI HYUNSEOK 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 17%
14 LIM Ryan Y. 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 29% 6%
15 MOON Sean H. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
16 BOLTON Braydon A. 100% 77% 35% 9% 1% -
17 DEMAREST Iain 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 10%
18 ZHOU Matthew R. 100% 100% 97% 78% 35% 8% 1%
19 VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Akhil 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 15% 1%
20 KIM Sean G. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 13%
21 BACON Elias (Eli) H. 100% 100% 100% 93% 66% 26% 4%
22 ERACHSHAW Taras P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 57%
23 MIKA Casper 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 7%
24 MERCHANT Marcel J. 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 17% 1%
25 HARVEY Nicholas J. 100% 100% 97% 82% 52% 20% 3%
25 JEFFORDS Alexander 100% 96% 72% 25% 4% - -
27 RIVERA Inigo Franco 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
28 CHANG Eliot A. 100% 98% 84% 54% 23% 6% 1%
29 KUSHKOV Simon O. 100% 99% 88% 52% 17% 2% -
30 LEE Kyle 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 17%
31 LIN John A. 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 21%
32 MCFADDEN Shae Q. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
33 SAKHAMURI Surya 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 60%
34 TONG Qilin 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
35 ATTIG Will T. 100% 100% 97% 83% 48% 13% 1%
36 BAILEY Asher 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 20% 3%
36 VAULES Charles W. 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 24% 4%
38 LAI Adam J. 100% 100% 98% 88% 64% 30% 7%
39 GREENWOOD Thomas R. 100% 100% 95% 65% 23% 3%
40 DENNER Lysander H. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
41 LIMB Matthew G. 100% 100% 93% 70% 36% 10% 1%
42 DODRILL Grant 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 14% 1%
42 KANG Brandon M. 100% 99% 91% 67% 33% 9% 1%
44 HARLEY Colby A. 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 24% 4%
45 CAI Lawrence (Larry) 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 7% 1%
46 WOOD Elden S. 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 6% -
47 DINU Nicholas D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 24%
48 SMITH David C. 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 11% 1%
49 RAI Avin 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 8%
50 OWENS William 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 8% 1%
51 HAMMER Peter A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
52 GUAY-TARDIF Xavier 100% 99% 89% 63% 29% 8% 1%
53 SHEPANEK Noah M. 100% 99% 85% 51% 16% 2%
54 LIANG Connor 100% 99% 87% 56% 19% 2%
55 SOHN Kevin J. 100% 92% 30% 3% - -
56 AURAY Phileas 100% 98% 73% 30% 5% -
57 HOLMES Aiden G. 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
58 CHAYEVSKY Kirk 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 5% -
59 NOBLE Daniel 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 11% 1%
60 PRIEST Leighton K. 100% 93% 64% 26% 5% - -
61 CHANG Howard 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 4%
62 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 22%
63 SHI Andrew 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 31%
64 WUN William 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
65 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 21%
66 CHENNURU Nischal 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
67 WILLIAMS Nolan E. 100% 99% 93% 67% 28% 4%
68 STONE Jack V. 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1%
69 KIM Benjamin H. 100% 97% 72% 31% 6% -
70 STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 18% 3%
71 LINSKY Matthew 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
72 MAHONEY Colin M. 100% 95% 75% 40% 13% 2% -
73 DESAI Drewv D. 100% 98% 82% 46% 13% 2% -
74 VASILYEV Nikita K. 100% 92% 66% 32% 10% 2% -
75 D'ORAZIO Joseph 100% 100% 97% 83% 55% 22% 4%
76 LEFEVRE Colin B. 100% 97% 80% 45% 15% 2% -
77 BROWNE JR Rolston D. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 43% 11%
78 CALLAHAN Jaden P. 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 6% 1%
79 HU William 100% 79% 36% 8% 1% -
80 BARNETT Peter 100% 99% 94% 70% 30% 3%
81 GILMORE Thomas W. 100% 100% 93% 65% 26% 4%
82 GINIS Nathan 100% 99% 88% 52% 15% 1%
83 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. 100% 100% 96% 75% 35% 6%
84 HAMMERSTROM Jared 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
85 DANNULL Lukas J. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
86 UEYAMA Ietetsu A. 100% 82% 46% 16% 3% - -
87 YOUNG Nash 100% 78% 37% 10% 1% - -
88 EPSTEIN Henry N. 100% 53% 15% 2% - - -
89 MARSEE James 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1% -
90 MYERS Kaleb S. 100% 95% 74% 38% 11% 1% -
91 YATES Colum C. 100% 97% 82% 49% 18% 3% -
92 HUSSAIN Faaris Zulfiqar 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 14%
93 PASTOR-JOBIN Matis 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
94 BARTOLO Domenic V. 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 29% 5%
95 ALKEMPER Tristan H. 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 4% -
96 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 18% 2%
96 LASORSA Matthew 100% 97% 78% 41% 12% 2% -
98 JAWOROWSKI Matthew 100% 97% 80% 49% 19% 4% -
99 MURZYN III CJ 100% 87% 53% 20% 4% - -
100 MOSKOWITZ Mason C. 100% 100% 95% 78% 44% 13% 1%
101 CZAHA Balint 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 42% 11%
102 TREJO Oliver 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 3% -
103 FLORES Peter D. 100% 88% 42% 10% 1% -
104 LO Joshua H. 100% 84% 46% 13% 1% -
105 HEATHCOCK Colin 100% 82% 42% 12% 2% -
106 MILLER Levi H. 100% 92% 65% 30% 8% 1% -
107 LIN William 100% 88% 56% 21% 4% - -
108 ROPER Evan C. 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 5% -
109 WANG Jonathan 100% 92% 65% 30% 8% 1% -
110 VAN DER MERWE Fabian 100% 94% 71% 38% 13% 2% -
111 KEEFE Duncan 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
112 LUO ZIRUI 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 5% -
113 PEDERSEN Leif 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2% -
114 TONG ZACHARY 100% 86% 51% 19% 4% - -
115 HUANG Ian 100% 79% 36% 9% 1% - -
116 DU Gavin J. 100% 91% 60% 23% 5% - -
117 PIHLSTROM Richie 100% 79% 35% 7% 1% - -
118 ZHOU Miles 100% 77% 32% 6% 1% - -
119 ESCUETA Tony V. 100% 62% 20% 3% - - -
119 LI Joshua L. 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
121 HINGNEKAR Aniket 100% 58% 17% 3% - -
121 LUEBBE Macklan C 100% 64% 15% 1% - -
123 HOEY-WASOW Henry 100% 98% 82% 48% 15% 2% -
123 GAFFNEY John M. 100% 86% 48% 15% 2% - -
125 GUZZO Vito 100% 92% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
126 KLAR Isaac A. 100% 99% 82% 46% 15% 3% -
127 KOKKIN Jack S. 100% 71% 25% 4% - -
128 NARANJO David E. 100% 78% 27% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.