LAIFC - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Haoran | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 2 | LIPTON Jason | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 3 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 12% |
| 3 | PAK Elliot | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 5 | SMITH Justin | - | - | 5% | 33% | 47% | 14% |
| 6 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | LIN Kyran | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 57% |
| 8 | SHIN Ryan | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | HAN Matthew | - | - | - | 5% | 39% | 56% |
| 10 | MIRANDA Matteo | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 6% |
| 11 | PEÑA Ethan | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
| 12 | JUGAN Bruce | - | - | 6% | 29% | 48% | 18% |
| 13 | HESSLEGRAVE Porter | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 14 | CHAO Warren | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 15 | EVERS Gabriel | - | 4% | 25% | 50% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | JU Hanul | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | LOCASALE Nicholas | 1% | 8% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | FU Adrian | 6% | 65% | 27% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | LI Zerong | 9% | 40% | 44% | 7% | - | - |
| 21 | KIM Alexander | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHARETTE Matthew | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | BROWN Riley | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | PACHON Diego | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | CAMP Ryder | 5% | 31% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 26 | CHARETTE Alex | 15% | 50% | 32% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | KIM Remington | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | BANGAYAN Anthony | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | DANKO Siena | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.