MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GILES Jeremy M. | V V V D | V V V V V | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 2 | MORREALE John | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | MENSAH Kennedy C | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | WU MENGKE | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | HARRIS Alex K. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | GARCIA Ryan | D D V V V D | V V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 9 | YAO Jonathan | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 10 | PEDERSEN Leif | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | LEVIN Mark A. | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | MORRILL William | V D D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 15 | GHOSH Tuhin | D D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 16 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | LEE Jude H. | V V V V V | D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 18 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V V V D | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 19 | NEVILLE James | V D V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 20 | YUAN Kevin | V V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | TORRENTE Jacinto | V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | LUO ZIRUI | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 24 | CHAN Daniel | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | GEORGE Daniel | V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | YEN Preston | V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 27 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | TANG Albert | D V V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 29 | OLAODE Stephen | D V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 30 | XU Michael | D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 31 | NOBLE Colin | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | FISK Ethan | V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 33 | STEINMETZ John | D V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 34 | KOGAN Benjamin | D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 35 | HAQ Kamran R. | V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 36 | TANG Brendan J. | D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 37 | OVERDECK Andrew | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | D D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 39 | HUANG Tyler T. | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 40 | QIN Alexander | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 41 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 42 | VAROQUA Tolby | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 43 | GOLD Jackson | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 44 | YASAN Anthony | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 45 | SUSSMAN Jamie | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 46 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 47 | ZELAYA Jayson | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 48 | HONG Justin | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 48 | RUDNET Noah | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 50 | ZHANG Yankun | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.