Salvation Army Gym - Savannah, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 2 | FREY Wayne N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
| 3 | DUBE Ian D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | MALLOY Patrick G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 5 | CLAYTON Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% | |
| 6 | BEACH Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 7 | HUESKE David B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 8 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 9 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 10 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 11 | PAULK Nikki K. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 12 | HILLARD Jay P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 13 | VALDIVIA Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | KERN Noah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 15 | JOHNSON Daniel P | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | PINCKNEY John F. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 17 | TAUBLER Michelle | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | MCGRATH Russell D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 19 | LEE Calla | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | BREGLER Johan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | MA Bochen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
| 22 | ABINERI Gillian C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
| 24 | BONNER Cohen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | BEARD Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 26 | PARAMESH Dhilan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 27 | MCFARLAND John G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 29 | KELLY Michael G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | SANFORD Kenyatta L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | GADDY Raymond W. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | JONES Ross | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MITCHEM Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | AVVA Valerie E. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 35 | STANCZAK Niall | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | FAILMEZGER Emmeline E. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 37 | DULISSE ALeX | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | PENSULA Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 39 | HIRSCH Jordan V. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 40 | FAILMEZGER Teige C. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BEARD Sarah Madeline | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GOLDER Christiane | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | YOON Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | GADDY Raymond | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 45 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | WATKINS Christopher M. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | MAUL Judy L. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SIKES Adam | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | DUNCAN Larry | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | MULLINS Catherine E. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 54 | GROCE Linda J. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MURPHY Christopher | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | PORRAS Sarah | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 57 | JULIEN Erica | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 58 | OLIVER Rachel | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.