Junior Olympics

Junior Women's Saber

Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Charlotte, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEE Alexandra B. - - - - 1% 17% 81%
2 JUNG Irene - - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
3 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. - - - - 2% 20% 78%
3 LIU Sophie - - - - 7% 34% 59%
5 ANDRES Charmaine G. - - - 1% 6% 33% 60%
6 GORMAN Victoria M. - - - 4% 20% 47% 29%
7 KIM Marley I. - - - 5% 27% 47% 20%
8 VADASZ Ibla P. - - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
9 KER Grace - - - 1% 12% 40% 47%
10 FEIG Sela - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
10 LIN Audrey J. - - - 1% 6% 31% 63%
12 TSUI Natalie - - 1% 6% 24% 44% 26%
13 YANG Angelina LeLe - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
13 JEONG Katie - - 3% 17% 38% 34% 8%
15 PAUL Lila - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
16 ZOLLER Noelle 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
17 FREEDMAN Janna N. - - - - 3% 25% 72%
18 OISHI Megumi - - - - 1% 12% 88%
19 LU Elaine - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
20 LU Amy - - 1% 10% 34% 42% 13%
21 CALLAHAN Chase J. - - 2% 17% 55% 26%
22 NGUYEN Siena - - 5% 23% 44% 24% 4%
23 NATH Trisha - - - 3% 16% 45% 36%
24 ZHANG XUANYI - - 4% 18% 38% 32% 9%
25 ATTIA Jasmine - 7% 26% 39% 23% 5% -
26 CHIOLDI Mina - - - 4% 22% 44% 28%
27 BEVACQUA Aria F. - - - 3% 19% 46% 32%
28 ZENG Sarah - 1% 6% 25% 39% 25% 5%
29 DUCKETT Madison - - - 6% 40% 54%
30 JOHNSON Dagny L. - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
31 MCKEE Brynnley - - 1% 9% 32% 43% 14%
32 YAO Rainie - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 4%
33 BLUM Leah I. - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
34 ANDRES Katherine A. - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
34 WEI JoyAnn - 2% 15% 37% 33% 11% 1%
36 HILD Nisha - - - - 6% 33% 60%
37 VESTEL Mira B. - - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
38 DANTULURI Shalini - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
39 TSE Angelina - - 2% 12% 35% 41% 10%
40 ERIKSON Kira R. - - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
40 SO Catelyn - - 5% 21% 40% 27% 6%
42 LEE Hannah - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
42 SHI Cathleen - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
44 GHAYALOD reya - - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
44 KONDEV Elizabeth - - 4% 20% 39% 30% 6%
46 LOO Kaitlyn 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
47 HAMMERSTROM Aria - 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
48 YANG Lea - - 4% 21% 40% 29% 6%
49 DONG Angel 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
50 BOIS Adele - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
51 BARNOVITZ Maya - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 1%
52 ALCEBAR Kayla - - 1% 6% 24% 46% 23%
53 HUAI Delilah - 2% 14% 44% 40%
54 MIKA Veronica - - - 2% 13% 42% 44%
55 LIN Nicole - - 2% 16% 40% 34% 7%
56 GOLDIN Nina - 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 2%
57 FAN Grace - 1% 7% 26% 40% 24% 2%
58 LEE Sophia - 1% 5% 20% 37% 29% 7%
59 TAN Adelyn - 4% 22% 40% 26% 7% -
60 PABIAN Emilia - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
61 SINHA Anika - - 5% 19% 37% 31% 8%
62 OLSEN Natalie J. - - - 1% 11% 41% 47%
63 LIU Sydney - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24% 1%
64 TONG Jessie 1% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3%
65 DELSOIN Chelsea C. - - - - 2% 19% 79%
66 SHEARER Natalie E. - - 1% 6% 27% 44% 22%
67 HUANG MADELINE - 5% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
68 BILILIES Sophia - 1% 9% 28% 40% 22%
69 LAURI Keira - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14% 1%
70 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
71 WANG Gloria Ruoyan - 6% 26% 38% 24% 5% -
72 HSU Leah 1% 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1%
73 CHAN Jolene - 1% 12% 34% 37% 14% 2%
74 WUNNAVA Ellora 5% 37% 41% 15% 2% - -
75 MANKOVA Varvara - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
76 FEARNS Zara A. - - - 4% 23% 45% 28%
77 KRASTEV Minna - - - 1% 11% 38% 50%
77 MERCHANT Aishwarya 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4% -
79 FAVO Isabella - - 4% 23% 43% 26% 4%
80 GRAJALES Hannah E. - 2% 15% 35% 33% 12% 1%
81 BALAKUMARAN Maya - - 4% 18% 38% 32% 7%
81 GUGALA Hanna - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 1%
83 SCHMIDT Isabel - 1% 8% 27% 40% 20% 3%
84 KRASOWITZ Lucy 1% 36% 42% 18% 3% - -
85 BUHAY Kirsten M. - 1% 8% 28% 39% 21% 3%
85 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika - - 3% 17% 39% 34% 6%
87 MARYASH Samantha - 1% 6% 23% 40% 26% 5%
88 GOMERMAN Sophia - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 1%
89 MANN Sophia J. - 2% 12% 32% 37% 15% 1%
90 LI Alexis - 2% 15% 36% 33% 12% 1%
91 GRULICH Rayaana - 2% 13% 34% 36% 14% 2%
92 PROBASCO Leila 2% 24% 44% 24% 5% - -
93 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 5%
94 FESTA Carina - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
95 DEHON Inès 3% 22% 43% 28% 4% -
96 FERNANDEZ Martina 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 3%
97 LIM Jaslene - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 9%
98 XIONG Haojiao - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
99 YOUNG Charlotte G. - 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 3%
100 LISSO Ria A. - 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 7%
100 LI Amanda C. - - - 4% 20% 45% 30%
102 LITTLE Avery 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% -
103 XIE Nora 3% 20% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
103 MCGRAW Sadie 2% 19% 42% 29% 8% 1% -
103 KINKADE Ellie 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6% -
106 VINOGOROVA Sofiia - 1% 9% 28% 39% 20% 2%
107 KHAN Alissa - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
108 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. - - 3% 18% 40% 33% 6%
109 MAKLIN Sofia - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 1%
110 NATHANSON Sammy E. - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 5%
111 MUND Ruth - 4% 23% 49% 24%
112 CARTER Keely 5% 23% 37% 27% 8% 1% -
113 JOHNSON Lydia - 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 6%
114 WANG Callie - 4% 19% 38% 30% 8% -
115 HORVITZ Jacqueline 23% 45% 27% 5% -
116 JOHNSON Lauren - - - 2% 14% 44% 40%
117 LOMOTAN Addison 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% - -
118 SCOTT Eve 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
119 GUVEN Coco 1% 9% 28% 38% 20% 4% -
120 MALEK Zolie - 1% 10% 32% 37% 17% 2%
121 CHIARELLI Valentina - - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8%
122 FANG Victoria W. - 1% 9% 29% 39% 21% 2%
123 PADANILAM Lily 1% 15% 41% 32% 9% 1% -
124 KANDADAI Lara 11% 33% 36% 17% 3% - -
125 XU Emily T. - 4% 20% 38% 29% 9% -
126 ZHENG Valentina - 4% 22% 39% 27% 7% 1%
127 ZHAI AMY 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
128 STADNIK Emilia 3% 37% 40% 17% 3% - -
129 DUDNICK Morgan - 10% 35% 38% 15% 2% -
130 GAUTAM Sahana - - 4% 20% 40% 31% 4%
131 CHIANG Melissa - 7% 36% 40% 15% 2% -
132 HU Anna 2% 15% 35% 32% 13% 3% -
133 CHI Claire 1% 9% 32% 37% 18% 3% -
134 BORDAS HILL Georgiana 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
135 MUNGUIA Mila 3% 21% 39% 28% 8% 1% -
136 STONE Coral - 5% 30% 42% 20% 3% -
137 FLATT Sophia 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% 1% -
138 ZHAN Sophie 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
139 BOYNTON Ainsley - 2% 15% 36% 34% 11% 1%
140 MEDVINSKY Alexandra - 3% 18% 37% 32% 10% -
141 LO Chloe 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3% -
142 ZHANG Sophie - 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% -
143 XA-CHIN Sara 16% 40% 31% 11% 2% - -
143 KURAEVA Vasilisa 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
145 ANTHONY Alexia B. - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 23%
146 DAI Olivia - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 1%
147 COLBY Mercer 5% 27% 41% 23% 5% - -
148 MONTORIO Lily M. 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
148 NAIR Supriya 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
150 LUKER Sophia - - 3% 15% 37% 37% 8%
151 LATYSHAVA Stephanie 10% 35% 38% 15% 3% - -
152 LEOU Korina 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 4% -
153 TA-ZHOU Emma 4% 26% 39% 23% 7% 1% -
154 BAIREDDY Maya 5% 27% 41% 22% 5% 1% -
155 HENRY Soraya S. - 3% 18% 39% 30% 9% 1%
156 WILSON Eva - 4% 29% 42% 21% 4% -
156 TESTROET Aubrey 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
158 TAN Kylie 16% 42% 33% 8% 1%
159 ARNOLD Hali - 1% 7% 28% 41% 22% 3%
160 DHAR Layla 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
161 KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra 14% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
162 ARNIPALLI Hamsika 1% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3%
163 HUANG Neila 18% 44% 31% 7% - -
164 LIU Yifei - - 4% 20% 40% 29% 6%
165 DIECK Miranda P. 4% 20% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
166 TUNG Renee 1% 10% 31% 36% 17% 3% -
167 SCHOEW Margot 15% 42% 31% 10% 1% - -
168 JEFFORDS Sophia 7% 38% 37% 15% 3% - -
168 NICHOLAS Eva 6% 31% 40% 19% 3% - -
170 BAVIPATI smira 13% 38% 34% 13% 2% - -
171 BERNARD Kathryn 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
172 ASHTIANI Shaya 11% 36% 37% 14% 2% - -
173 HALPERIN Elizabeth H. 9% 36% 37% 15% 3% - -
173 KIM Karen 7% 46% 36% 10% 1% - -
175 ELLIS-FURLONG Ava 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
176 YANNOPOULOS Pompie 4% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
177 SHINCHUK Ellisha 2% 17% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
177 SUHALIM Maree 12% 46% 33% 8% 1% - -
179 CHEN Elaine 12% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
180 TEYSSIER Katherine 12% 35% 34% 15% 3% - -
181 HOLMES Sabrina 7% 37% 37% 15% 3% - -
182 RANJAN Diya 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
183 BROCK Sydney - 5% 19% 34% 30% 11% 1%
184 CHOU Zoe 6% 28% 39% 22% 5% - -
185 BIRNSTILL Reese 1% 15% 40% 32% 10% 1% -
186 WILSON Sophie 35% 44% 18% 3% - - -
187 FREEMAN Armine 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
188 DAMBAL Sasha - 9% 33% 39% 16% 3% -
188 GENTILE Vittoria 10% 43% 36% 10% 1% - -
190 NEUMAN Ella 11% 32% 36% 18% 3% - -
191 ZHAO Emily W. 4% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
192 GOSAVI Aabolee 1% 50% 38% 10% 1% - -
193 BROWNER June 12% 37% 35% 14% 2% - -
194 CAO Sophie 17% 42% 32% 8% 1%
195 NAYAK Esha 10% 31% 36% 19% 4% -
196 PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari 2% 18% 41% 33% 6% -
197 LAGOON Miriam 32% 43% 21% 4% - - -
198 HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
199 LIGH Erenei J. - 1% 6% 23% 41% 27% 2%
200 TABANGAY Heartlyn - < 1% 6% 24% 41% 24% 5%
201 DAVIS Jayna M. 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 6% 1%
202 RAMIREZ Mirka A. - 2% 14% 37% 34% 12% 1%
203 BAIRD Kaleah 11% 61% 25% 4% - - -
204 WANG Jiayi 13% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
205 LEE Lauren 1% 13% 35% 36% 13% 2% -
206 BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra - 1% 11% 45% 35% 8% 1%
207 PASUPULETI Laya 46% 40% 12% 1% - - -
207 MALLAMPATI Jaabili 17% 42% 31% 9% 1% - -
209 LUKER Hannah - 11% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
210 FENG Alicia G. 3% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
211 COOVADIA Malina 43% 42% 13% 2% - - -
212 SINGER Ellery 17% 47% 28% 7% 1% - -
212 BRUNGARDT Gabriela 70% 27% 3% - - - -
214 RIVERS Mikhala 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
215 WALLER London 5% 23% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
216 MACKAY Katherine 32% 43% 20% 4% - - -
217 BUSH Bethany 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
217 REAVIS Isabel 25% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
219 BARROSO Isabela 8% 33% 37% 18% 4% - -
220 GOLOVITSER Maya - 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
221 MAROSFOI Virag 49% 39% 10% 1% - - -
222 REGANTI Sitara 7% 43% 37% 11% 1% - -
223 BAINS Nandini 53% 36% 10% 1% - -
224 GOURNEAU Sophie L. 9% 37% 38% 14% 2% - -
224 BRODERICK Kylin < 1% 2% 12% 32% 37% 15% 2%
226 KHOST Maeve 35% 44% 18% 3% - -
227 WANG Peijia 32% 43% 20% 4% - - -
227 NEWMARK Ellie 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
229 GERASIMOVA Valeria 52% 39% 8% 1% - - -
230 CONNOLLY Vida 11% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
230 KIM Sophia 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 3% -
232 SAWANT Asmi 33% 44% 20% 3% - - -
232 PHAN Genevieve 51% 37% 11% 2% - - -
234 SMITH Sydney 62% 33% 5% - - - -
234 BUSHMAN MaeBelle 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
236 ESPINOSA Rachel 81% 19% 1% - - - -
236 WANG Caroline 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
236 BANGALORE Shriya 62% 32% 5% - - - -
239 SCHNELL Cassandra 95% 5% - - - - -
239 YOO Audrey 63% 32% 5% - - - -
241 HARRISON Allie 78% 20% 1% - - - -
241 NASER Sarah 14% 43% 32% 10% 2% - -
243 MCCAWLEY Madeleine 97% 3% - - - - -
243 JUDE Simona 87% 12% - - - - -
245 ORLOVA Anastasia 74% 23% 2% - - - -
246 POLSTON Ella 40% 42% 16% 2% - - -
247 BABCOCK Madeline 62% 32% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.