Music City Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
2 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | 8% | 40% | 52% |
3 | DELAP Rylan Q. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 25% |
3 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 58% | 30% |
5 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
6 | LI Simon A. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% |
7 | DROUTMAN Ryan | - | 3% | 28% | 46% | 20% | 2% |
8 | OH SEAN | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 35% | 7% |
9 | CREEL Aidan H. | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 9% |
10 | SALSMAN IV John E. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 15% |
11 | RAY Johnathan | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
12 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | 8% | 37% | 44% | 12% |
13 | UPTON Craig | 13% | 52% | 32% | 3% | - | - |
14 | CURTIS William K. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
15 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 20% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | EDWARDS Darby | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
17 | LEYLAND John | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - |
18 | HEARN Christen J. | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - |
19 | JONES Nate | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
20 | COVER Harrison | 25% | 50% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
21 | TUGGY Sam | 5% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 2% | - |
22 | BAKER Julian L. | 8% | 42% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
23 | COLLUM Thomas | 2% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
24 | SOUTH Joseph | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
25 | LIM Joshua | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
26 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 3% | 24% | 45% | 25% | 3% | - |
27 | SORRELLS Brea | 33% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
27 | USELTON Kaden | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | BURT Stephen | 15% | 52% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
30 | AMMON Blue | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.