Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 2 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 3 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 77% |
| 5 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 44% |
| 6 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 7 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 8 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 91% |
| 9 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 91% |
| 9 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 9 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 49% | 27% |
| 12 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 13 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 14 | MEI Sarah | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 27% |
| 15 | MI Aileen | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 46% | 33% |
| 16 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% | |
| 17 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 18 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 19 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% |
| 20 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 43% |
| 21 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
| 22 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 23 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 38% |
| 23 | LI Eleanor | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 17% |
| 25 | HO Addison | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 42% | 6% |
| 26 | SUN Emily | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 13% |
| 26 | OH Ceana | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 3% |
| 28 | YANG Audrey | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
| 29 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
| 30 | ZHANG Selena | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 40% | 2% |
| 31 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 41% |
| 32 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 32% | 3% |
| 33 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 34 | XIE Lillian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 42% | 2% |
| 35 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 46% | 9% |
| 36 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 37 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 38 | LAI Sophia | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 49% | 24% |
| 39 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 44% | 16% |
| 39 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
| 41 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 42 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 24% |
| 43 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% |
| 44 | STRUGAR Steliana | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 41% | 2% |
| 45 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 45% | 10% |
| 46 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 47 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
| 47 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 33% | 5% |
| 49 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 11% |
| 49 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 7% |
| 51 | DO Leila | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 38% | 4% |
| 52 | WANG Joanna | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 1% | |
| 53 | SHENG Chuxi | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 31% | |
| 54 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 25% | |
| 55 | BROWN Lola | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 56 | FUNG Vera | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 57 | LEE Allison | - | - | 7% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
| 58 | LENK Sophie | - | - | 9% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 58 | ZHOU Catherine | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 11% |
| 60 | KIM Rachel | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 27% |
| 61 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 42% | 14% |
| 62 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 23% |
| 63 | LI Joy | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 64 | YU Jane | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 18% | 3% |
| 65 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 66 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 67 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 68 | VO Bao-Vy | - | - | 4% | 24% | 47% | 23% | 1% |
| 69 | MORALES Paulina | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | - |
| 70 | PARK Lina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 43% | 41% | 8% |
| 71 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 72 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% |
| 73 | LEVY Avery | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 74 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 34% | |
| 75 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
| 76 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 13% | 49% | 35% | 1% |
| 77 | PENG Serena | - | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 10% |
| 78 | JOO Natalie | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 79 | GUAN Adeline | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 80 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 81 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 42% | 5% |
| 82 | WANG Chloe | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 82 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 84 | HAN Crystal | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 34% | 4% |
| 84 | SHTEPA Rada | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 86 | MU Allison | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 42% | 5% |
| 87 | REN Kayley | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 43% | 5% |
| 88 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
| 89 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 55% | 7% |
| 89 | WANG CAROL | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 31% | 6% |
| 91 | XIE Su | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 92 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 93 | YAN Noelle | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% |
| 94 | HOBSON Ava | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 95 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 96 | CHENG Isa | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 97 | HAO Danica | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 98 | FIELD Julianna | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 1% | |
| 99 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 18% | |
| 100 | POEI Lauren | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 101 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 102 | LUH Mia P. | - | 6% | 30% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
| 103 | WANG Celine S. | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 104 | MIRZA Sophia | 1% | 13% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 104 | MCFARLANE Asha | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 106 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 107 | BERGEL Daphne | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% | - |
| 108 | FENG Audrey | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 109 | LUO Miranda | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 109 | ALKADI Mai | 1% | 9% | 36% | 45% | 9% | - | - |
| 111 | CHUNG Chloe | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | BABIAC Julia | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 113 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 114 | KIM Claire | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | LAO Sophia | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 116 | CAMPBELL June | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 117 | WANG DINA C. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 118 | BADLANI Diya | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 119 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 120 | COOPER Piper W. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
| 121 | PARK Zena | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 122 | WANG Sophia | 1% | 11% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 123 | PENG Charlotte | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 124 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 125 | LIU Long | 2% | 19% | 51% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 126 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 127 | POWLEDGE Cora | 2% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 128 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 2% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
| 129 | CHOI Kailyn | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 130 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 1% | 14% | 54% | 28% | 2% |
| 131 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 132 | GOLLNICK Mira | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 1% |
| 133 | BABER Eshaal | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 134 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | - | 8% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 135 | ROY Layla | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 7% |
| 136 | OWENS Elise | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 137 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 138 | SHUM Maya | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 139 | KO Claire | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 44% | 17% | 1% |
| 140 | MCKAY Teresa | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 141 | KANG Marian | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 142 | BASILE Gianna | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | - |
| 143 | SHENG Katherine | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 144 | GOEL Riyana | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | ZHENG Zoe | 1% | 8% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 145 | GUO Audrey | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 147 | ZHOU Joi | 2% | 32% | 46% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
| 148 | ALVAREZ Isabella | 13% | 44% | 35% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 149 | PEDERSEN Clara | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | HAN Katherine | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 151 | PUOPOLO Mia | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 152 | TAO Ann | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 153 | LIU Emily | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 154 | WANG Yudi | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% | - |
| 155 | CHOI Sophie | 3% | 22% | 45% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 156 | CAO Kayla | - | 9% | 37% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 157 | DONG Emily | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 158 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 159 | LIU Elinda | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 160 | ISHANOVA Sofia | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 161 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 3% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 162 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 6% | 44% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 163 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | - | 7% | 33% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 164 | SWOPE Farren | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 165 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 166 | LAZAR Carolina | 5% | 33% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 167 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 168 | HANNAH Abigail | 3% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 169 | NIRGUDE Esha | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 170 | LYON Claire | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 171 | BUDKO Julia | 1% | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 171 | LAY Apollonia | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 173 | LAWRENCE Nia | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 174 | KATS Ekaterina | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 175 | SHICK Veronika | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 176 | MALONE Ella | 21% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 177 | WU Chingfei Amber | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 178 | DESAI Esha | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 179 | JACOB Norah | 52% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 180 | JOHNSTON Maeli | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 181 | SHMUKLER Maria | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 182 | BLAKEY Heaven | 5% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 183 | MOORE Addisyn | 4% | 46% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 184 | CHENG Emily | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 185 | LIU Grace | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 185 | HARROLD Sophia | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 187 | LAU Elena | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 187 | SHELTON Olivia | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 189 | MADDEN Sidney | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 190 | CADENA Anneli | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 191 | COX Sophia | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 191 | MCDANIEL Laila | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 193 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 194 | CHANG Janelle | 11% | 46% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 195 | SINGH Sania | 58% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 196 | HUFFMAN Taeli | 7% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 197 | VAN DRIMMELEN Zoe | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 198 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 27% | 54% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 199 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 199 | SEO odelia | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 201 | CHU Felicity | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 202 | MULLER Van | 26% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 203 | UHRICH Reese | 26% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 204 | MAHESH Sehar | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 205 | MARISTANY Marbella | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 206 | ROTHMAN Rebecca | 23% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 207 | JOHNSSON Emma | 2% | 31% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 208 | BECK Liliyana | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 209 | COLLINS Anna | 11% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 210 | STONE Sydney | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 211 | CHANG Nola | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 212 | LAYE Isabella | 19% | 50% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 213 | GREENLEAF Ella | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 214 | VERGARA Jaden Reese | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 215 | SUNMAN Rory | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 216 | LEE Jeemin | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 217 | CHANG Olia | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 217 | LIU Joanna | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 219 | LEE Allison | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 219 | WYATT Stella | 4% | 28% | 45% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 221 | SHIN Jaelynn | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 221 | YOTHER Anna | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 221 | CHEN Zixian | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 221 | SHIEH Kiley | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 225 | MANDZY Athena | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 225 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 227 | LEE Madeleine | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 228 | XU Emmy | 4% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 228 | POMPE VAN MEERDERVOORT Olivia | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 228 | HENRY Quinn | 39% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 231 | CHENG Emma | 86% | 13% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 231 | WOJCIK Lucyna | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 233 | MEITZEN Havah | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 233 | GRIMM Parker | 44% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 233 | SERRANO Jasmin | 17% | 48% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 236 | BRUCE Naomi | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 236 | MARKERT Delaney | 50% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 238 | SAUCEDO Fernanda | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 239 | ZAHALSKY Abigail | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.